Teams

YMCA:Grant

2026 NH Adult 18 & Over Women Evening · 2.5 Women 1

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NEW HAMPSHIRE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesKelly Cleghorn / Shannon Mccarthy vs Taryn Connery / Kai Honda0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesWinter Royce-roll vs Kate Mcafee0-6, 0-6
2026-06-16vs YMCA:PembertonLost 03
L#1 DoublesCatherine Gagnon / Shannon Mccarthy vs Shelley Song / Suping Li5-7, 1-2
L#1 SinglesMargaret Tomas vs Samantha Astarita1-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesJulianne Murthi / Kelly Cleghorn vs Patty Pemberton / Marilyn Mitchell2-6, 3-6
2026-06-04vs YMCA:PlummerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristin Grant / Catherine Gagnon vs Nancy Bax / Sarah Broderick6-7, 0-2
W#1 SinglesMargaret Tomas vs Paula Termine6-0, 6-2
2026-05-26vs HH:Sattler:MackenzieSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKristin Grant / Winter Royce-roll vs Sandra DeBardi / Jennifer Larco1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMargaret Tomas vs Natalia Markelova6-0, 6-4
2026-05-19vs YMCA:PembertonLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristin Grant / Marge Pagliuca vs Deidre Ashe / Allyson Keating6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJulianne Murthi vs Samantha Astarita7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKelly Cleghorn / Gail Nickerson vs Azy Farzan / Marilyn Mitchell1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesMargaret Tomas / Gail Nickerson vs Taryn Connery / Andrea Hadfield3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJulianne Murthi vs Kate Mcafee0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesWinter Royce-roll / Catherine Gagnon vs Stacey Smith / Erin Preston2-6, 4-6
2026-04-28vs YMCA:PlummerLost 03
L#1 DoublesMargaret Tomas / Catherine Gagnon vs Nancy Bax / Sandra L'Heureux7-6, 2-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJulianne Murthi vs Hope Vasquez0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGail Nickerson / Marge Pagliuca vs Paula Termine / Joreen Hendry6-7, 0-3
2026-04-21vs HH:Sattler:MackenzieLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristin Grant / Catherine Gagnon vs Emilee Sattler / Michelle Dufoe5-7, 3-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMargaret Tomas vs Sandra DeBardi6-3, 5-3
L#2 DoublesWinter Royce-roll / Kelly Cleghorn vs Karina MacKenzie / Laura Kalinowski0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 2.5 Women 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HSB:MarkyMarkAndTheTennisBunch:Smith082139128
2YMCA:Plummer08121225196
3YMCA:Grant0832142249

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.09 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.33
Margaret Tomas
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Marge Pagliuca
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.28
Catherine Gagnon
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
2.15
Karen Kennedy
published
2.13
Gail Nickerson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.04
Julianne Murthi
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.02
Kristin Grant
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
1.85
Winter Royce-roll
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.73
Kelly Cleghorn
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Shannon Mccarthy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marge Pagliuca + Gail Nickerson3732% games−16.2% vs expected
Gail Nickerson + Catherine Gagnon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Tomas
15W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Marge Pagliuca
55W–105L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.28
2.5
Catherine Gagnon
50W–94L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.28
Karen Kennedy
2W–11L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Gail Nickerson
31W–74L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Julianne Murthi
8W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Kristin Grant
4W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Winter Royce-roll
1W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85
Kelly Cleghorn
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.73
Shannon Mccarthy
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.