Teams

Cartee 18s 8.5 Combo W Tues PM

2024 Piedmont Combo 18 & Over · 8.5 18 & Over Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#2 DoublesJennifer Turner / Erin Huffines vs Ginny Lewis / Ann Martel3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesDabney Porter / Erin Huffines vs Yukari Matsuoka / Sayaka Matsuoka4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-08-20vs Milam 18s 8.5 Combo W Tues PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesErin Huffines / Jennifer Turner vs Jessica Bair-Epps / Suzanne Rudy7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 18 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Dia Roberts
published 4.5
4.08
Linda Helms
published
3.88
Jill Bowman
published
3.85
Kristi Collins
published
3.84
Erin Huffines
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.76
Catherine Stopka
published 4
3.75
Dabney Porter
published 4
3.72
Kara Ray
published
3.70
Beverly Tuttle
published 4
3.67
Mimi Cartee
published
3.67
Heidi Wrisley
published 4
3.43
Carrie McElvogue
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Tuttle + Catherine Stopka4448% games−3.0% vs expected
Beverly Tuttle + Dabney Porter3741% games−5.1% vs expected
Dia Roberts + Linda Helms3253% gamesnot enough data
Dabney Porter + Kristi Collins134 matchesnot enough data
Dia Roberts + Jill Bowman123 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Stopka + Carrie McElvogue033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dia Roberts
14W–11L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
4.12
Linda Helms
20W–12L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
4.08
Jill Bowman
18W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.88
Kristi Collins
6W–20L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
3.85
4
Erin Huffines
173W–130L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.84
4
Catherine Stopka
10W–17L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Dabney Porter
12W–26L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.75
Kara Ray
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Beverly Tuttle
15W–19L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Mimi Cartee
17W–17L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Heidi Wrisley
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Carrie McElvogue
4W–23L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.