Teams

Stonehenge Bull

2023 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekday Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-07-12vs TDC LongLost 01
L#1 SinglesDenise Weisberg vs Cynthia Mistretta4-6, 5-7
2023-07-07vs CCV ReifsniderLost 01
L#1 SinglesDenise Weisberg vs Catherine Benevento2-6, 3-6
2023-07-05vs Woodlake CookseyLost 01
L#1 SinglesDenise Weisberg vs Cindy Birnbaum5-7, 0-6
2023-06-30Lost 01
L#1 SinglesDenise Weisberg vs Colleen Quinn1-6, 4-6
2023-06-23vs SCC TotaroWon 10
W#1 SinglesDenise Weisberg vs Laura Haskin6-2, 4-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Weekday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Denise Weisberg
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Judy Napier
published
3.22
Linda Larue
published
3.04
Maureen Sisti
published
2.96
Karen Grimes
published
2.88
Terri Estes
published
2.85
Donna Bull
published
2.70
Ann Falk
published 3
2.46
Betty Snavely
published 3
2.44
Betsy Goodreau
published 3
Zoe Emerson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Bull + Terri Estes1636% games−14.9% vs expected
Judy Napier + Linda Larue123 matchesnot enough data
Terri Estes + Ann Falk123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Weisberg
174W–160L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.31
Judy Napier
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Linda Larue
18W–17L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Maureen Sisti
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Karen Grimes
0W–8L career · no lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
2.96
Terri Estes
3W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Donna Bull
4W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Ann Falk
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Betty Snavely
0W–6L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.46
3
Betsy Goodreau
0W–11L career · no lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.44
Zoe Emerson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.