Teams

Alley Cats

2023 Montgomery Adult Other Fall Weekday Women · Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-11vs FuntennisWon 10
W#1 DoublesSara Franklin / Alixandria Lapp vs Jennifer Garcia / Rosanne Johnston6-2, 6-2
2023-12-01vs Manor 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlixandria Lapp / Maria Elena Greene vs Marijane Forde / Sherifa Fahmy6-4, 6-3
2023-11-28vs Tennis SharksWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobin Birchfield / Maria Elena Greene vs Brittany Persino / Karyn DeVito6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAlixandria Lapp / Maggie Sullivan vs Susan Friedman / Lynn Todorov6-2, 7-5
2023-11-17vs Anything But NetLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlixandria Lapp / Julia Saperstein vs Kimberly Klimek / Anabela Puhl3-6, 0-6
2023-11-06vs Making a RacketLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristy Hinckley / Alixandria Lapp vs Sherry Altman / Loan Nguyen5-7, 5-5
2023-11-02vs Chicks with SticksWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlixandria Lapp / Mary Asel vs Caroline McLoughlin / Lisa Raker4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2023-10-24vs Edge ComboWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaria Elena Greene / Alixandria Lapp vs Lisa Davison / Sandy Schefkind6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult Other 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Christy Hinckley
published 3.5
3.41
Robin Birchfield
published
3.40
Maria Elena Greene
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.28
Maggie Sullivan
published
3.26
Alixandria Lapp
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Monica Granovsky
published
3.02
Mary Asel
published
2.98
Sara Franklin
published
2.82
Kim Mullin
published
Julia Saperstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Elena Greene + Alixandria Lapp341855% games+3.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christy Hinckley
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Robin Birchfield
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
3.41
3.5
Maria Elena Greene
67W–44L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
Maggie Sullivan
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Alixandria Lapp
63W–49L career · 10 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Monica Granovsky
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Mary Asel
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Sara Franklin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
2.98
Kim Mullin
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Julia Saperstein
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.