Teams

Ne.Day18M

2026 Capital Mixed 18 & Over · 10.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.81 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-31vs Je.Burnette18MWon 20
W#1 DoublesNena Marks / Evan Wharton vs Jeni Burnette / Brent Bennett6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmma Heiderscheit / Davis Felts vs Jeffrey Fadool / Sarah Barnhill6-4, 7-6
2026-07-26vs Je.Burnette18MLost 01
L#1 DoublesPhillip Cardella / Nena Marks vs Jeni Burnette / Peter Vangraafeiland4-6, 6-7
2026-07-19vs Ta.Tedamrongwanish18MLost 12
L#1 DoublesNena Marks / Parv Mital vs Jennifer McEntee / Aneesh Kodali3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPaula Collado Cordon / Phillip Cardella vs Kwame Owens / Tanita Tedamrongwanish6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Alvarez / Justin Radloff vs Jennifer Hiller / Grant McGrew4-6, 2-6
2026-06-28vs Ta.Tedamrongwanish18MLost 12
L#1 DoublesPaula Collado Cordon / Andrew Perdue vs Jennifer Hiller / Ravi Tewari1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNodirbek Korchiev / Nena Marks vs Madeline Brown / Grant McGrew3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesEvan Wharton / Elizabeth Speicher vs Aneesh Kodali / Tanita Tedamrongwanish6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2026-06-21vs Je.Burnette18MSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNena Marks / Parv Mital vs Sarah Barnhill / Andrew Stewart6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAnastasiya Manet / Phillip Cardella vs Drew Sandri / Alice Stubbs2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-07vs Ta.Tedamrongwanish18MWon 30
W#1 DoublesNena Marks / Justin Radloff vs Ravi Tewari / Madeline Brown7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesPhillip Cardella / Anastasiya Manet vs Kwame Owens / Jennifer Hiller6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesAndrew Perdue / Jennifer Reese vs Heather Remley / Aneesh Kodali6-2, 7-5
2026-05-31vs Je.Burnette18MWon 20
W#1 DoublesNena Marks / Evan Wharton vs Jeni Burnette / Andrew Stewart6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEmma Heiderscheit / Nodirbek Korchiev vs Alice Stubbs / Peter Vangraafeiland4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-17vs Ta.Tedamrongwanish18MWon 30
W#1 DoublesParv Mital / Nena Marks vs Mary Hartley / Aneesh Kodali6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnastasiya Manet / Phillip Cardella vs Jennifer McEntee / Parker Sheridan6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesBeatrice Faureng / Davis Felts vs Heather Remley / Kwame Owens6-2, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 10.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ne.Day18M5316824230
2Ta.Tedamrongwanish18M53131124201
3Je.Burnette18M2661838256

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.57 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Emma Heiderscheit
published
4.87
Nena Marks
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 5
4.81
Laura Alvarez
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.81
Justin Radloff
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.79
Beatrice Faureng
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.69
Anastasiya Manet
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.55
Evan Wharton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.54
Elizabeth Speicher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.47
Phillip Cardella
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.46
Parv Mital
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.44
Andrew Perdue
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.43
Paula Collado Cordon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.42
Nodirbek Korchiev
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.35
Jennifer Reese
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Davis Felts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anastasiya Manet + Phillip Cardella314 matchesnot enough data
Nena Marks + Davis Felts123 matchesnot enough data
Nena Marks + Phillip Cardella123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emma Heiderscheit
3W–0L career · no lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.88
5
Nena Marks
89W–36L career · 8 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.87
Laura Alvarez
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.81
Justin Radloff
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.81
5
Beatrice Faureng
10W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.79
5
Anastasiya Manet
31W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.69
Evan Wharton
22W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
4.55
Elizabeth Speicher
12W–20L career · 1 line in 2026
no projection at this level
4.54
5
Phillip Cardella
30W–32L career · 5 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.47
Parv Mital
26W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
4.46
4.5
Andrew Perdue
33W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
4.44
5
Paula Collado Cordon
64W–56L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.43
4.5
Nodirbek Korchiev
38W–23L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
4.42
Jennifer Reese
29W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
1%86%14%
4.35
4.5
Davis Felts
63W–95L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
4.11

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.