Teams

Team Palle

2022 Loudoun Tri-Level Men · Loudoun Tri-Level 4.5,4.0,3.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.31 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-12-29vs RC UnitedWon 20
W#1 DoublesBlake Nuwayhid / Aaron Thede vs Todd Gordon / Andreas Mundt6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRaman Batish / Devarshi Bhatt vs Andras Szakal / Sean Klinge6-4, 6-3
2022-12-10vs RC UnitedWon 20
W#1 DoublesDhiraj Jagasia / Jordan Bentley vs Matthew Schenk / Todd Gordon6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChip Hathaway / Sumeet Chawla vs Benjamin Butler / David Flam6-1, 6-1
2022-12-03vs RC UnitedWon 10
W#2 DoublesChip Hathaway / Nathan Quan vs David Flam / Ronald Feigles6-2, 6-4
2022-11-12vs RC UnitedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDhiraj Jagasia / Wornden Ly vs Edward Brophy / Vijay Shah2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSean Quan / Nathan Quan vs David Flam / Andras Szakal6-2, 6-0
2022-11-04vs RC UnitedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChip Hathaway / Jordan Bentley vs Vijay Shah / Lonn Larson5-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSHAHZAMAN SAEED / Raman Batish vs Andras Szakal / Richard Wailes6-0, 6-4
2022-10-30Won 10
W#3 DoublesNathan Quan / SHAHZAMAN SAEED vs Benjamin Butler / Richard Wailes6-3, 6-3
2022-10-29vs RC UnitedLost 01
L#1 DoublesJordan Bentley / Blake Nuwayhid vs Edward Brophy / Vijay Shah3-6, 4-6
2022-10-24Won 10
W#2 DoublesChip Hathaway / Benjamin Parker vs Todd Gordon / Matthew Schenk6-3, 6-0
2022-10-17vs RC UnitedWon 10
W#2 DoublesChip Hathaway / Wornden Ly vs David Flam / Benjamin Butler6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Tri-Level 4.5,4.0,3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.96 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Nathan Quan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Dhiraj Jagasia
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.11
Chip Hathaway
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.07
3.98
Blake Nuwayhid
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.86
Jordan Bentley
published
Aaron Thede
published 4
Devarshi Bhatt
published 4
3.51
Sean Quan
published
3.36
Raman Batish
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jorge Prieto Choy
published
Lohit Palle
published
Sumeet Chawla
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nathan Quan
86W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
4.50
5
Dhiraj Jagasia
99W–65L career · 2 lines in 2022
95%5%<1%
4.29
4.5
Chip Hathaway
207W–115L career · 5 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
4.11
4.5
Gaiell-Mitchell Kercy
2W–8L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
4.07
4.5
Blake Nuwayhid
32W–61L career · 2 lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.98
Jordan Bentley
23W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.86
4
Aaron Thede
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Devarshi Bhatt
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sean Quan
8W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.51
3.5
Raman Batish
77W–117L career · type S · 2 lines in 2022
<1%86%13%
3.36
Jorge Prieto Choy
9W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lohit Palle
5W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sumeet Chawla
23W–12L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.