Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CW6.5A

2022 COMBO · Women 6.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Julia Peng
published
3.73
Robyn Vanderluit
published
3.72
Anh-Vi Dao
published 4
3.29
3.27
Michelle Blake
published
3.25
Cathleen Ligman
published 3.5
3.25
Deena Elfar
published 3.5
3.22
Lauren Roseman
published
3.19
3.11
Vera Parengkuan
published
3.10
Patrizia Fazeli
published
3.04
Andrea Coleman
published 3
3.01
Gigi Harvey
published 3.5
2.96
Corrine Fabie
published 3.5
2.65
Paulina Bettink
published
Jeanette Dayan
published
Maureen Petersen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Dao-Makiyama + Vera Parengkuan4148% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julia Peng
21W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
Robyn Vanderluit
9W–14L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Anh-Vi Dao
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
3.5
Catharine Hershey-Lin
7W–10L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Michelle Blake
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Cathleen Ligman
10W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Deena Elfar
19W–34L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Lauren Roseman
11W–12L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
Theresa Dao-Makiyama
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
Vera Parengkuan
12W–14L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Patrizia Fazeli
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Andrea Coleman
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%36%64%
3.04
3.5
Gigi Harvey
6W–15L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
3.01
3.5
Corrine Fabie
9W–14L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.96
Paulina Bettink
2W–17L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Jeanette Dayan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Petersen
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.