Teams

EHTC:Reiner/Paskowitz

2026 NCT Adult 65 & Over Men · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Men

8 players · average NTRP / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-07-29vs IPCC:Licari/BenoitLost 01
L#1 DoublesKenneth Landy / Larry Hutnick vs David Callahan / Leonard Licari6-7, 6-7
2026-07-29vs IPCC:Licari/BenoitLost 01
L#1 DoublesKenneth Landy / Larry Hutnick vs David Callahan / Leonard Licari3-6, 3-6
2026-06-24vs IPCC:Licari/BenoitWon 21
W#1 DoublesKenneth Landy / Michael Murray vs Leonard Licari / Henry Risman6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKenneth Paskowitz / Ken Dorros vs Richard Leaf / Anthony DePace2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJeremy Greshin / Mike Reiner vs Robert Bondaruk / Robert Treitel7-5, 6-3
2026-06-24vs IPCC:Licari/BenoitLost 12
L#1 DoublesKenneth Landy / Michael Murray vs Richard Leaf / Anthony DePace6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMike Reiner / Jeremy Greshin vs Leonard Licari / Henry Risman3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKenneth Paskowitz / Ken Dorros vs Robert Bondaruk / Robert Treitel6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 Adult 65 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1IPCC:Licari/Benoit045714125
2EHTC:Reiner/Paskowitz043918128

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Kenneth Paskowitz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Kenneth Landy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Ken Dorros
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Jeremy Greshin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.58
Mike Reiner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Tod Robberson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Larry Hutnick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Murray
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Paskowitz + Ken Dorros7357% games+1.9% vs expected
Kenneth Paskowitz + Mike Reiner7553% games−0.9% vs expected
Kenneth Landy + Larry Hutnick3354% gamesnot enough data
Kenneth Landy + Michael Murray224 matchesnot enough data
Larry Hutnick + Ken Dorros134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kenneth Paskowitz
42W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Kenneth Landy
28W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.88
Ken Dorros
19W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.69
Jeremy Greshin
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
3.60
Mike Reiner
27W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
Tod Robberson
75W–138L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.25
Larry Hutnick
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Murray
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.