Teams

Harris - Lawn and Tennis 65+

2025 Sandhills Adult 65 & over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-23vs Bryan - Highland Country Club 65+Split 11
L#2 DoublesMarcy Isenhart / Deborah Masotti vs Lynn Floyd / Susan Cheatwood1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLynn Goldhammer / Janet Bell vs Marion Bryan / Charlotte Gallagher7-6, 2-4
2025-04-16vs Bryan - Highland Country Club 65+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesLisa Cook / Amie Irby vs Deborah Milburn / Harriett Shooter1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJanet Bell / Lynn Goldhammer vs Mary Bonsall / Charlotte Gallagher0-6, 2-6
2025-04-09vs Bryan - Highland Country Club 65+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesVictoria Adkins / Amie Irby vs Kim Hasty / Deborah Milburn4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCassie Drexel / Marcy Isenhart vs Mary Bonsall / Harriett Shooter0-6, 6-7
2025-03-19vs Bryan - Highland Country Club 65+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCynthia Ballantyne / Lynn Goldhammer vs Karen Rogers / Lynn Floyd6-7, 3-6
2025-03-15vs Bryan - Highland Country Club 65+Split 11
W#2 DoublesAmie Irby / Lynn Goldhammer vs Lynn Floyd / Charlotte Gallagher6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDeborah Masotti / Marcy Isenhart vs Harriett Shooter / Susan Cheatwood3-6, 4-6
2025-03-12vs Bryan - Highland Country Club 65+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesEllen Harris / Marcy Isenhart vs Kim Hasty / Mary Bonsall3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCassie Drexel / Amie Irby vs Lynn Floyd / Charlotte Gallagher6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLynn Goldhammer / Kay Crist vs Susan Cheatwood / Harriett Shooter6-4, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Victoria Adkins
published
3.22
Marcy Isenhart
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Amie Irby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Donna Hicks
published
Deborah Masotti
published 3
2.66
Lynn Goldhammer
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.61
Kay Crist
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Goldhammer + Marcy Isenhart0631% games−3.0% vs expected
Amie Irby + Victoria Adkins134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Victoria Adkins
41W–37L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Marcy Isenhart
11W–41L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Amie Irby
99W–119L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Donna Hicks
17W–13L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Deborah Masotti
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Lynn Goldhammer
20W–81L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
3
Cynthia Ballantyne
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Kay Crist
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.