Teams

GSCC BLUE

2026 CTA TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS · WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-09-02vs BASALT PURPLEWon 21
W#1 DoublesShauna de Moraes / Kate McRaith vs Laura Coarsey / Julie Cohen6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKimberly Hammond Pattillo vs Whitney Carper3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBarb Hovde-Brown / Anne Swanson vs Amy Gordon / Angela Rooding6-1, 6-3
2026-08-26vs SMGLR REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesShannon Dilley / Carolyn Strautman vs Darcy Conover / Jodi Jacobson6-7, 2-6
2026-08-19vs RVR REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberly Hammond Pattillo / Anne Swanson vs Carrie Kellman / Michelle Bevington1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBarb Hovde-Brown / Lynsey Pulliam vs Nancy Harris / Karen Fullerton2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-12vs GSCC PURPLELost 12
L#1 DoublesKate McRaith / Carolyn Strautman vs Anna Lorenson / Joy Hamilton4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAndie Hall vs Susie Demers2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShannon Dilley / Lynsey Pulliam vs Kate Leibinger / Courtney Little3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Shauna de Moraes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Andie Hall
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.86
Kate McRaith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.85
Lynsey Pulliam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Anne Swanson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.83
Kimberly Hammond Pattillo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.75
Carolyn Strautman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Barb Hovde-Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Shannon Dilley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carolyn Strautman + Shauna de Moraes10358% games+7.0% vs expected
Carolyn Strautman + Kimberly Hammond Pattillo134 matchesnot enough data
Kate McRaith + Lynsey Pulliam224 matchesnot enough data
Lynsey Pulliam + Anne Swanson314 matchesnot enough data
Anne Swanson + Kimberly Hammond Pattillo314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shauna de Moraes
23W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Andie Hall
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Kate McRaith
12W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Lynsey Pulliam
19W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Anne Swanson
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Kimberly Hammond Pattillo
11W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Carolyn Strautman
15W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Barb Hovde-Brown
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%84%1%
2.64
Shannon Dilley
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.