Teams

Bowes/Unger

2026 ONE Doubles SPRING · 3.0 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-04-29vs Ducharme: Nick 1 and Nick 2Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSean Haung / Erik Bowes vs Nick Ducharme / Nicholas Mattila1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-28vs Rajagopalan/SpeyerWon 10
W#1 DoublesErik Bowes / Sean Haung vs Ram Rajagopalan / Zach Speyer6-3, 6-4
2026-04-22vs Gaytan/BlesboisWon 10
W#1 DoublesErik Bowes / Sean Haung vs Arnaud Blesbois / Jordan Gaytan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2026-03-25vs Rajagopalan/SpeyerWon 10
W#1 DoublesErik Bowes / Sean Haung vs Ram Rajagopalan / Zach Speyer5-7, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Yu: Baseliners6060124
2Siva/Keys5151451
3Bowes/Unger4242650
4Ducharme: Nick 1 and Nick 24242861
5Chandler3333647
6Gaytan/Blesbois3333634
7McGowan: SK McSwizz2424958
8Dy/Wight/Riel15151069
9Reding/Palm15151072
10Rajagopalan/Speyer15151166
11Fordham: Minneapolis Underground15151169

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Erik Bowes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.81
Sean Haung
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Chad Unger
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erik Bowes + Sean Haung314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Erik Bowes
15W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.88
Sean Haung
10W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Chad Unger
1W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.