Teams

Tigar/Chattanooga

2025 Adult 55 & Over-Chattanooga · 3.5 women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-05vs Palisoc/ChattanoogaLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarol Tigar / Sharel Hooper vs Lynne Barkeloo / Amy Weathers6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLori Cook / Libby Dixon vs Cathy Palisoc / Sarah Delay2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJessica Stamper / Marialice Hatch vs Angie Cowart / Heather Tuttle6-4, 6-4
2025-03-22vs Palisoc/ChattanoogaWon 21
W#1 DoublesPat Weddle / Sharel Hooper vs Michelle Larson / Shana Patten2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLAURA VAUGHN / Marialice Hatch vs Lucynda Cynda Holmes / Dee Dee Buckley7-5, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLibby Dixon / Lori Boyd vs Angie Cowart / Heather Tuttle1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-03-09vs Palisoc/ChattanoogaLost 12
L#1 DoublesLibby Dixon / Lori Boyd vs Cathy Palisoc / Sarah Delay6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCarol Tigar / Jessica Stamper vs Amy Weathers / Michelle Rauch6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesSharel Hooper / Pat Weddle vs Angie Cowart / Heather Tuttle4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Sharel Hooper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Carol Tigar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Libby Dixon
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Lori Boyd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Jessica Stamper
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Lorraine Marks
published
3.19
Marialice Hatch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.19
Pat Weddle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Renee McClanahan
published
3.11
Kimberly Conner
published
3.10
LAURA VAUGHN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sharel Hooper + Carol Tigar5262% games−5.8% vs expected
Jessica Stamper + Marialice Hatch404 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Stamper + Carol Tigar303 matchesnot enough data
Lori Boyd + Libby Dixon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharel Hooper
21W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Carol Tigar
37W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
Libby Dixon
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Lori Boyd
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jessica Stamper
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Lorraine Marks
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Marialice Hatch
25W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Pat Weddle
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Renee McClanahan
23W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
Kimberly Conner
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
LAURA VAUGHN
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.