Teams

EEisenbaum (Park Road)

2022 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-04vs LBlack (Providence Plantation)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKate MacRone / Gladys Shinmoto vs Leslee Black / Nanci Weil6-3, 6-1
2022-09-27vs EFrederick/LRogers (Foxcroft East)Split 11
L#1 DoublesGladys Shinmoto / Linda Notarangelo vs Annie Spence / Micah Caruana6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRachel Miller / Jami Stone vs Andrea Harknett / Elizabeth Frederick6-0, 6-1
2022-09-20vs HFranc (Piper Glen)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesGladys Shinmoto / Heidy Bartell vs Hilary Lee / Stephanie Rock1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKate MacRone / Stephanie Leichtweis vs Hayley Franc / Jessica Fink2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-09-15vs MJessee (Blakeney)Split 11
L#1 DoublesGladys Shinmoto / Kate MacRone vs Nickole Branch / Lindsay Nichols3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesElaine Eisenbaum / Jami Stone vs Shanin Trivanovic / Debbie Ebensberger6-4, 6-2
2022-09-13vs MMcSherry (PCC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesGladys Shinmoto / Linda Notarangelo vs Carla Ackels / Lauren McNeely6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMelissa McVey / Jami Stone vs Chris Reynolds / Brenley Ogden6-1, 6-1
2022-09-06vs SBurke (Raintree)Won 10
W#2 DoublesGladys Shinmoto / Kate MacRone vs Elizabeth Scoville / Suzanne Austin6-3, 6-2
2022-08-20vs AEllis (Jeff Adams)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRachel Miller / Kate MacRone vs Abbey Ellis / Marsha Brenes4-6, 3-6
2022-08-16vs AEagan (Weddington)Split 11
L#1 DoublesJami Stone / Rachel Miller vs Amanda Eagan / Joanne Miller4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGladys Shinmoto / Heidy Bartell vs Pamela Trantham / Tracy Amos6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Gladys Shinmoto
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #1 Doubles 39% · published 3
2.95
Elaine Eisenbaum
published 3
2.90
Jami Stone
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.87
Sara Ash
published
2.80
Kate MacRone
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.46
Heidy Bartell
published 3
Melissa McVey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gladys Shinmoto + Kate MacRone314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Gladys Shinmoto
100W–119L career · 13 lines in 2022
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Elaine Eisenbaum
17W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Jami Stone
97W–95L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
2.90
Sara Ash
15W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%83%16%
2.87
3
Kate MacRone
77W–124L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Heidy Bartell
13W–15L career · no lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.46
Melissa McVey
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.