Teams

MY Guy FWL A40-3.0W

2022 WMI FWL USTA League Adult 40&Over Weekday Leagues · WMI FWL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player)

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2021-11-17vs MVS Stevens FWL A40-3.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesShannon Carr / Christine Douma vs Mia Helweg / Tammy Graves6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJanet Bjerke / Tonia Williams vs Amy Stevens / Margaret Greydanus4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMeryl Ray / Lora Krone vs Rosemary Heule / Tracy Missad0-6, 0-6
2021-09-08vs MVS Stevens FWL A40-3.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristine Douma / Mary Lou Guy vs Mia Helweg / Tammy Graves1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesShannon Carr / Janet Bjerke vs Margaret Greydanus / Kathleen Sylvester4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRose Roth-Bowersock / Lora Krone vs Rosemary Heule / Jennifer Costa3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WMI FWL A40&O 3.0 W (6 player) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Tonia Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Mary Lou Guy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Rose Roth-Bowersock
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Christine Douma
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.46
Lora Krone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.19
Josette Gatchalian
published
Janet Bjerke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kris Drews
published
Meryl Ray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Carr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Douma + Mary Lou Guy132145% games+1.8% vs expected
Kris Drews + Josette Gatchalian3337% games−7.9% vs expected
Rose Roth-Bowersock + Josette Gatchalian0619% games−17.4% vs expected
Lora Krone + Josette Gatchalian01213% games−18.3% vs expected
Shannon Carr + Christine Douma314 matchesnot enough data
Rose Roth-Bowersock + Mary Lou Guy033 matchesnot enough data
Rose Roth-Bowersock + Lora Krone033 matchesnot enough data
Kris Drews + Lora Krone123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tonia Williams
34W–65L career · 1 line in 2022
77%23%<1%
2.90
Mary Lou Guy
34W–76L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
Rose Roth-Bowersock
10W–31L career · 1 line in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.62
3
Christine Douma
58W–102L career · 5 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
2.53
Lora Krone
18W–82L career · 2 lines in 2022
62%38%<1%
2.46
Josette Gatchalian
14W–81L career · no lines in 2022
99%1%<1%
2.19
Janet Bjerke
6W–30L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kris Drews
6W–20L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Meryl Ray
0W–11L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Shannon Carr
17W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.