Teams

Bonnet/40/7.5/CM/CP

2026 NO Southern Combo 40 & Over - Men · 7.5 NO (40&O) Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 upcoming · 1 played
Sep 9 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Sep 16 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
Sep 21 6:30 PM
vs N/A
Jason BonnetJourdan Generes
Sep 30 6:30 PM
Capitano's Tennis & Athletic Club
Oct 7 7:00 PM
City Park Tennis Center
2026-08-26vs Legrand/40/7.5/CM/CapsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJavier Jacome / Greg Dadlez vs Yeon Lee / Rick Burnett6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJourdan Generes / Lance McCardle vs Shakeeb Shariff / Bryan Hale6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMichael Madere / Nick Dobson vs Tony Paternostro / Tim Kern6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 7.5 NO (40&O) Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Miller/40/7.5/CM/CP000000
2Legrand/40/7.5/CM/Caps000000
3Walker/40/7.5/CM/CP000000
4Costello/40/7.5/CM/MCC000000
5Bonnet/40/7.5/CM/CP000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Javier Jacome
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.91
Matthew Bolton
published
3.89
Thomas Wolf
published
3.86
Lance McCardle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Nick Dobson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Larry Holder
published
3.74
Greg Dadlez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Christian Generes
published 3.5
3.63
Michael Madere
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Jason Bonnet
published
3.46
Jourdan Generes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Richard Barfield
published
3.42
Jason Akers
published
3.40
Chad Caldwell
published 3.5
3.31
Mark Staines
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jourdan Generes + Jason Bonnet12556% games+5.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Javier Jacome
19W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Matthew Bolton
26W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.91
Thomas Wolf
18W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.89
Lance McCardle
14W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.86
Nick Dobson
9W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%4%
3.76
Larry Holder
11W–10L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Greg Dadlez
21W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.74
3.5
Christian Generes
31W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
Michael Madere
37W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.63
Jason Bonnet
56W–13L career · no lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Jourdan Generes
28W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
Richard Barfield
16W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Jason Akers
5W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.42
3.5
Chad Caldwell
6W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.40
Mark Staines
28W–7L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.