Teams

MLMSHE-Shelton/Westport 55+ 3.5

2024 Lake 55 & Over Mixed Doubles · Mixed 3.5 Thurs pm 55+

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-08-11vs MLABO-Bogojevich/CSD 55+ 3.5 MXLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusie Adams / Spurgeon Mackie vs Louis Foreman / Sherry Lerme3-6, 4-6
2024-08-01vs MLCJA-Smith-Japec/LNRC 55+ 3.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesDoug Thompson / Denise Bost vs Lorelei Hewitt / Keith Hornbeck6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSusie Adams / Robert Breeden vs Cindy Japec / Stephen Pratt3-6, 4-6
2024-07-28vs MLDTU- Turek/Westport 55+ 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesSusie Adams / Spurgeon Mackie vs David Turek / Mary Clare Hainsworth6-3, 6-4
2024-07-11vs MLBK-King/Jetton 55+ MxLost 01
L#2 DoublesTommy Huskey / Denise Bost vs James Borders / Ann Modlin3-6, 1-3
2024-07-04vs MLABO-Bogojevich/CSD 55+ 3.5 MXLost 02
L#1 DoublesColeen Foye / Spurgeon Mackie vs Kathleen Rissberger / Paul Thompson2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusie Adams / David Shelton vs Kathy Buaron / Louis Foreman2-6, 1-6
2024-06-27vs MLCJA-Smith-Japec/LNRC 55+ 3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesColeen Foye / Spurgeon Mackie vs Stephen Pratt / Noreen Soos6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDenise Bost / David Shelton vs Richard Procissi / Lorelei Hewitt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-20vs MLDTU- Turek/Westport 55+ 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDoug Thompson / Coleen Foye vs John Murphy / Mary Clare Hainsworth4-6, 3-6
2024-06-06vs MLBK-King/Jetton 55+ MxLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Shelton / Susie Adams vs Alan Rummelsburg / Laura Engel7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJames Dalmas / Denise Bost vs Brent King / Elizabeth Johnson4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 3.5 Thurs pm 55+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Susie Adams
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.46
Coleen Foye
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Denise Bost
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Patricia Ferguson
published
3.09
James Dalmas
published
Robert Breeden
published
Spurgeon Mackie
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susie Adams
157W–55L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
3.5
Coleen Foye
170W–76L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Denise Bost
205W–139L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Patricia Ferguson
11W–17L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.12
James Dalmas
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.09
Robert Breeden
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Spurgeon Mackie
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.