Teams

TOC.Wilkins

2024 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 9.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.57 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-10-05vs TING.ByrdSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAneesh Kodali / William Hall vs Christopher Fletcher / Beomjun Ju0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesConnor Wilkins / Strickland Parks vs Justin Panepinto / Kwame Owens5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-14vs TING.ByrdLost 01
L#1 DoublesAneesh Kodali / Strickland Parks vs Brett Eckles / Andrew Perdue3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-09-07vs TOC.BrownWon 20
W#1 DoublesJonathan Hodges / Adam Troxell vs Kevin Huang / Brennan Doran6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAneesh Kodali / James Miron vs Joshua Franceschina / Ben Glass6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-09-04vs TING.ByrdLost 01
L#1 DoublesAneesh Kodali / Anil Chawla vs Beomjun Ju / Christopher Fletcher1-6, 3-6
2024-08-24vs MD.JenningsWon 20
W#1 DoublesAnil Chawla / Aneesh Kodali vs Jonathan Wade / Jeffrey Schroeder7-5
W#2 DoublesStrickland Parks / Nick Brittis vs Jerfi Cicin / David Marquina6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 9.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Justin Radloff
published
4.64
Connor Wilkins
published 5
4.40
Jonathan Hodges
published
4.35
James Miron
published 4.5
4.34
Aneesh Kodali
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.34
Kevin Powell
published
4.31
Richard Papantonis
published
4.29
Nick Brittis
published
4.29
Aaron Hiller
published 4.5
Adam Troxell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.15
Anil Chawla
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.12
Strickland Parks
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Radloff
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
4.79
5
Connor Wilkins
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
4.64
Jonathan Hodges
15W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
James Miron
17W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
4.35
4.5
Aneesh Kodali
119W–59L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
4.34
Kevin Powell
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
4.34
Richard Papantonis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.31
Nick Brittis
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Aaron Hiller
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Adam Troxell
34W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Anil Chawla
63W–49L career · 2 lines in 2024
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Strickland Parks
61W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
4.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.