Teams

Marion - FK/Centonze

2022 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.08 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-20vs Villages - EngLost 01
L#2 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Julie Haynes vs Debbie Bohl / Jill Kimball6-7, 4-6
2022-03-19vs FK - HatfieldSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElaine Parker / Eileen Lombardo vs Yvonne Schappell / Pamela Plumlee3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLeigh Chak / Dina Sapienza vs Linda Jones / Erica Migliorati7-6, 6-4
2022-03-06vs SKY - PayneWon 10
W#1 DoublesElaine Parker / Eileen Lombardo vs Marti Little / Susan Garrick6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2022-03-05vs SKY - PayneLost 01
L#2 DoublesLeigh Chak / Beth Riendeau vs Marti Little / Susan Garrick6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-02-20vs Villages - EngWon 10
W#2 DoublesElaine Parker / Eileen Lombardo vs Jennifer Blanzy / Shelley Watters6-3, 6-2
2022-02-19vs FK - WalshSplit 11
W#1 DoublesElaine Parker / Eileen Lombardo vs Valerie Elvin / Diane Stablein6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLeigh Chak / Julie Haynes vs Jan Cole / Marianne Marcoux5-7, 1-6
2022-02-12vs FK - HatfieldWon 10
W#2 DoublesElaine Parker / Eileen Lombardo vs Patti Hischmann / Linda Jones6-4, 7-5
2022-01-15vs FK - WalshWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeigh Chak / Julie Haynes vs Lisa McTaggart / Lisa Degirolami6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesEileen Lombardo / Dina Sapienza vs Valerie Elvin / Tina Shuman7-6, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Drae Centonze
published 5
3.86
Eileen Lombardo
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.77
Beth Riendeau
published 4
3.65
Lynn Swets
published
3.50
Karen Fellabaum
published
3.48
Elaine Parker
published 4
3.48
Dina Sapienza
published 4
3.27
Wendy MacMurray
published
Carmen Rosario
published 3.5
Julie Haynes
published
Leigh Chak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Chak + Eileen Lombardo134 matchesnot enough data
Eileen Lombardo + Dina Sapienza314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Drae Centonze
102W–22L career · no lines in 2022
47%53%<1%
4.51
4
Eileen Lombardo
304W–158L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.86
4
Beth Riendeau
8W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Lynn Swets
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.65
Karen Fellabaum
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Elaine Parker
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
55%45%<1%
3.48
4
Dina Sapienza
8W–7L career · no lines in 2022
56%44%<1%
3.48
Wendy MacMurray
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Carmen Rosario
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Julie Haynes
10W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Leigh Chak
140W–143L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.