Teams

BETC-Nguyen

2025 Adult 40 & Over · 5.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.68 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-15vs NWW-MI-CondiottyLost 02
L#1 SinglesTuan Nguyen vs Jesse Walter1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAdam Amsel / Baraka Brown vs Rob Condiotty / Brian Murphy6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2025-03-08vs NWW-FC-RegalaLost 02
L#1 DoublesBen Falk / David Ichikawa vs Josh Basha / Nicholas Bass2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAdam Amsel / David Han vs Alan Regala / Mark Ball7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-21vs NWW-MI-CondiottyLost 12
W#1 DoublesKevin ODonnell / Richard Deitz vs Andrew Elling / Ken Bang7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesAdam Amsel vs Brian Murphy4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Han / Ben Falk vs Rob Condiotty / Jeffrey Richards1-6, 0-6
2025-02-15vs NWW-FC-RegalaLost 03
L#1 DoublesChuong Tran / David Ichikawa vs Nicholas Bass / Charles Thompson2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAdam Amsel vs Jevin West2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBaraka Brown / David Han vs Jeff Scott / Mark Ball7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2025-02-01vs NWW-MI-CondiottyLost 12
W#1 DoublesChuong Tran / Richard Deitz vs Andrew Elling / Nick Moxley6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrent Chin vs Brian Murphy1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTuan Nguyen / Brandon Ferguson vs Rob Condiotty / Jeffrey Richards3-6, 3-6
2025-01-25vs NWW-FC-RegalaLost 03
L#1 DoublesCory Moderhak / Brent Chin vs Charles Thompson / Michael Costello2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAdam Amsel vs Alan Regala4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJoel Bodine / Kevin ODonnell vs Jevin West / Mark Ball6-7, 2-6
2025-01-24vs NWW-FC-RegalaLost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin ODonnell / Richard Deitz vs Michael Costello / Josh Basha7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesDavid Han vs Jevin West2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTuan Nguyen / Ben Falk vs Alan Regala / Mark Ball2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-01-10vs NWW-MI-CondiottyLost 03
L#1 DoublesChuong Tran / David Ichikawa vs Vivek Varma / Jesse Walter3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAdam Amsel vs Brian Murphy3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBaraka Brown / David Han vs Rob Condiotty / Andrew Elling2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.44 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Chuong Tran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.68
Richard Deitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.58
David Ichikawa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.50
Baraka Brown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 5
4.48
Tuan Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.45
Joel Bodine
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.42
Adam Amsel
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.39
Cory Moderhak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.35
Kevin ODonnell
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
Brandon Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.18
Ben Falk
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 4.5
4.06
David Han
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4.5
Brent Chin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Deitz + Chuong Tran7654% games+4.5% vs expected
Kevin ODonnell + Cory Moderhak6362% games+4.5% vs expected
Baraka Brown + Joel Bodine3646% games−0.1% vs expected
Chuong Tran + David Ichikawa2445% games−4.6% vs expected
Richard Deitz + David Ichikawa7547% games−5.0% vs expected
Baraka Brown + Chuong Tran4545% games−9.6% vs expected
Richard Deitz + Joel Bodine4153% gamesnot enough data
Richard Deitz + Kevin ODonnell224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Chuong Tran
46W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.77
5
Richard Deitz
125W–117L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.68
5
David Ichikawa
22W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.58
5
Baraka Brown
77W–71L career · 10 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.50
Tuan Nguyen
47W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.48
4.5
Joel Bodine
136W–97L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
4.45
4.5
Adam Amsel
24W–27L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.42
4.5
Cory Moderhak
54W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
4.39
4.5
Kevin ODonnell
95W–46L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
4.35
4.5
Brandon Ferguson
7W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Ben Falk
59W–67L career · 11 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
4.18
4.5
David Han
24W–16L career · type A · 5 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
Brent Chin
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.