Teams

Grynwald/LR/Reb

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-02-03vs Dobry/Maumelle/BPWon 30
W#1 SinglesGabriel Womack vs John Lee6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMichael Iwamura vs Jarred Kibbey7-5, 6-0
W#3 SinglesTanner Mantooth vs Christopher Chen6-2, 7-5
2025-01-25vs Nelsen/LR/BPWon 21
L#1 SinglesBrandon Showmar vs Matthew Nelsen4-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesKirk Grynwald vs Sam Ivanovsky6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesGabriel Womack vs Cody Glenn6-0, 6-4
2024-12-12vs Szeto/LR/RebLost 01
L#3 SinglesKirk Grynwald vs Jason Bennett5-7, 4-6
2024-12-09vs Nerusupalli/LR/RebWon 10
W#2 SinglesGabriel Womack vs Kumar Patel6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-11-14vs Massey/Burns/LRWon 21
W#1 SinglesKirk Grynwald vs Spencer Mathews6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesTanner Mantooth vs Stan Belue6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesMax Good vs Sean Massey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-11-11vs Abston/LR/RebSplit 11
W#1 SinglesBrandon Showmar vs Gerald New5-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#3 SinglesGabriel Womack vs Blake Abston1-6, 0-6
2024-11-07vs Osborn/Cabot/BurnsWon 20
W#2 SinglesGabriel Womack vs Joel Petty6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesKirk Grynwald vs Robert Lee6-2, 6-4
2024-11-06vs Aguilar/Team ATA/RebWon 30
W#1 SinglesMichael Iwamura vs Paul Swann6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesZachary Webster vs Grant Morshedi6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesTanner Mantooth vs Ryan Harpenau6-4, 6-2
2024-10-30vs Overley/CollinsWon 21
W#1 SinglesZachary Webster vs William Collins7-6, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKirk Grynwald vs Jonathan Parkey6-1, 6-3
L#3 SinglesTanner Mantooth vs William Pollock0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Gabriel Womack
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Singles 40% · published
3.42
Brandon Showmar
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.34
Randy Rankin
published
3.27
Kirk Grynwald
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
3.17
Zachary Webster
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.96
Michael Iwamura
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.90
Max Good
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Tanner Mantooth
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gabriel Womack
25W–9L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3
Brandon Showmar
6W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Randy Rankin
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Kirk Grynwald
34W–33L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
Zachary Webster
23W–13L career · 4 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Michael Iwamura
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.96
Max Good
21W–13L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
Tanner Mantooth
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.