Teams

Mellon Bubble 18+

Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ALLEGHENY MNTN.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-26vs PTA WarriorsLost 13
W#1 DoublesKyle Frank / Tim Lloyd vs Hansraj Sao / Tom Yeh6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Clark / Charlie Hansen vs Stephen Nalepa / Steven Wolk1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesSean Nolan vs Chad Groves3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMark Soccio / Michael Rath vs Mark Wollenschlaeger / Louis Hughes3-6, 4-6
2026-07-18vs Blazing FuryLost 04
L#1 DoublesVikram Hodachalli / Mark Soccio vs Jeffrey Astbury / Bapi Raju2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesNoah Gasparro vs Philip Smalley4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCharlie Hansen / Carl Kurlander vs Shishir Vaidya / David Walch3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesTom Beck / Thomas Cacciarelli vs Jacob Black / Hermes Cordoba4-6, 2-6
2026-07-12vs Blazing FuryWon 32
L#1 DoublesTom Beck / Michael Rath vs David Walch / Bradford Astbury1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCharlie Hansen vs Philip Smalley2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAaron Liang / Mark Soccio vs Larry Jiang / Jorge Guajardo Merchan6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesVikram Hodachalli vs Shishir Vaidya6-3, 5-3
W#3 DoublesCarl Kurlander / Thomas Cacciarelli vs Payne Roberts / Maxwell Nemec6-2, 7-6
2026-06-13vs PTA WarriorsLost 23
L#1 DoublesSean Nolan / Michael Rath vs Joe Kelly / Steven Wolk2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesVikram Hodachalli vs Shreyas Shinde6-3, 3-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Cacciarelli / Kyle Frank vs Stephen Nalepa / Tom Yeh3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAaron Liang vs Victor Montes7-5, 4-2
L#3 DoublesCarl Kurlander / Michael Clark vs Felipe Cavalcanti / James Moss4-6, 4-5
2026-05-17vs PTA WarriorsLost 13
L#1 DoublesAaron Liang / Tim Lloyd vs Joe Kelly / Steven Wolk3-6, 5-6
L#2 DoublesSean Nolan / Michael Rath vs Hansraj Sao / Tom Yeh3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKyle Frank vs Shreyas Shinde7-6, 5-3
L#3 DoublesCharlie Hansen / Noah Gasparro vs Corey Barbusio / Felipe Cavalcanti1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-04-25vs Blazing FuryLost 12
W#1 DoublesTim Lloyd / Aaron Liang vs Richard Jones / Jeffrey Astbury7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesVikram Hodachalli vs Bradford Astbury5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTom Beck / Carl Kurlander vs Glenn Cawood / Hermes Cordoba3-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PTA Warriors0622819203
2Blazing Fury06121840282
3Mellon Bubble 18+06111943306

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Noah Gasparro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.83
Kyle Frank
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.74
Aaron Liang
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.73
Vikram Hodachalli
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.64
Thomas Cacciarelli
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Mark Soccio
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.58
Charlie Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.50
Tom Beck
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
Sean Nolan
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.43
Carl Kurlander
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jake Limpert
published
Michael Clark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Michael Marks
published
Sachidananda Rajulu
published
Tim Lloyd
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Lloyd + Michael Marks4158% games+12.7% vs expected
Tom Beck + Tim Lloyd6356% gamesnot enough data
Carl Kurlander + Tim Lloyd134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noah Gasparro
8W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
Kyle Frank
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Aaron Liang
4W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Vikram Hodachalli
12W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.73
Thomas Cacciarelli
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
Mark Soccio
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%79%<1%
2.62
3
Charlie Hansen
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
2.58
Tom Beck
14W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
Sean Nolan
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
3
Carl Kurlander
15W–31L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.43
Jake Limpert
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Clark
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michael Marks
15W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sachidananda Rajulu
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tim Lloyd
62W–69L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.