Teams

LCRI-Richards/CSD 55+ 9.0

2025 Lake USTA 55 & Over League · Women 9.0 SAT 2:00

8 players · average NTRP 4.33 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-12vs LBNE-Newell/RR 55+ 9.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBrenda Levy / Elizabeth Krogstie vs Lynn Chambers / Britt Ruby1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Rouchon-Wells / Peg Blomme vs Bonnie Newell / Diane Dreffer1-6, 5-7
2025-04-04vs LBNE-Newell/RR 55+ 9.0Split 11
W#2 DoublesLori Scherrman / Kari Andrews vs Lynn Chambers / Britt Ruby4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPeg Blomme / Lisa Scott vs Jayne May / Sachi Denny0-6, 0-6
2025-03-29vs LBNE-Newell/RR 55+ 9.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKari Andrews / Lori Scherrman vs Sachi Denny / Jeanne Armstrong7-5, 7-6
2025-03-22vs LBNE-Newell/RR 55+ 9.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBrenda Levy / Elizabeth Krogstie vs Bonnie Newell / Jayne May5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPatricia Rouchon-Wells / Peg Blomme vs Diane Dreffer / Laurie Venzon6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 9.0 SAT 2:00 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Kari Andrews
published 4.5
4.26
Lori Scherrman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Christine Richards
published 4.5
4.07
Brenda Levy
published 4.5
3.98
Pamela Beecher
published
3.67
Elizabeth Krogstie
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.57
Peg Blomme
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Scherrman + Kari Andrews4166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kari Andrews
20W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
4.5
Lori Scherrman
133W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%4%
4.26
4.5
Christine Richards
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
4.09
4.5
Brenda Levy
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
4.07
Pamela Beecher
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.98
4
Elizabeth Krogstie
263W–129L career · 10 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Peg Blomme
14W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
Patricia Rouchon-Wells
13W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.