Teams

Team 4 - Q - 18

2022 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.71 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-05-15vs Nicolle & SarahLost 13
W#1 DoublesApril Korshin / Christine Fagerstrom vs Lucille Abe / Cindy Nunn6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSaharra McKee vs Rebecca Kinworthy3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Westwick / Kerry Youngren vs Sarah Gillstrom / Nicolle Welch4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTriin Minton / Marlys Morton vs Catherine Stone / Katrina Brown1-6, 2-6
2022-05-15vs Nicolle & SarahLost 04
L#1 DoublesApril Korshin / Christine Fagerstrom vs Allison Erickson / Lucille Abe4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSaharra McKee vs Catherine Stone2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesLinda Westwick / Kerry Youngren vs Nicolle Welch / Sarah Gillstrom4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKaren Loeffler / Marlys Morton vs Alice Knapp / Cindy Nunn2-6, 3-6
2022-05-13vs Nicolle & SarahLost 02
L#1 DoublesApril Korshin / Karen Loeffler vs Sarah Gillstrom / Lucille Abe3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTriin Minton / Marlys Morton vs Alice Knapp / Cindy Nunn4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
April Korshin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Linda Westwick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Saharra McKee
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.50
Triin Minton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Kerry Youngren
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.36
Marlys Morton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Karen Loeffler
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

April Korshin + Triin Minton10070% games+11.3% vs expected
Triin Minton + Marlys Morton353851% games−2.0% vs expected
Triin Minton + Linda Westwick224 matchesnot enough data
Karen Loeffler + Linda Westwick314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Loeffler + Marlys Morton213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
April Korshin
113W–101L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Linda Westwick
28W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Saharra McKee
50W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Triin Minton
123W–112L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Kerry Youngren
39W–54L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Marlys Morton
161W–112L career · type A · 3 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Karen Loeffler
68W–83L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.