Teams

WS - McLaughlin

2021 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.56 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-12-12vs Alachua - DB/GilsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmber Muehlmann / Sandra Camin vs Haile Ratliff / Marlene Townsend2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLaurie McLaughlin / Lindsey Wilson vs Aubrey Hall / Tracy Hodson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Cribb / Alicia Pfahler vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-12-05vs DB - EdelsteinLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmber Muehlmann / Jigisha Shah vs Melinda Hart / Kjerstin Terry6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLaurie McLaughlin / Lindy Archambeau vs Caroline Hord / Shannon Reintgen0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnchalee Phataralaoha / Amy Feutz vs Hadleigh Green / Elizabeth Dickerson2-6, 0-6
2021-11-21Split 11
L#2 DoublesJennine Brandt / Mary Cribb vs Samantha Walton / Lan Hoang-Minh4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAlicia Pfahler / Courtney Woody vs Amanda Fuller / Deborah McCleery6-4, 6-4
2021-11-14vs Alachua - DB/GilsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Feutz / Lindy Archambeau vs Marlene Townsend / Michelle Ivanowski5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAurymar Rodriguez / Sandra Camin vs Susan Benton / Aubrey Hall1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaurie McLaughlin / Jigisha Shah vs Kathleen Outman / Darby Townsend2-6, 5-7
2021-11-07vs DB - EdelsteinSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMary Cribb / Lindy Archambeau vs Hadleigh Green / Kelly Banes6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Feutz / Ali Messenger vs Melinda Hart / Wheeler Crawford7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2021-10-31vs JTC - Fuller/ThiebaultWon 20
W#1 DoublesCourtney Woody / Jigisha Shah vs Kim Magee / Alison Andrus4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAli Messenger / Aurymar Rodriguez vs Kannika Torres / Taiana Mendez6-2, 6-3
2021-10-24vs Alachua - DB/GilsonLost 03
L#1 DoublesJigisha Shah / Jennine Brandt vs Debbie McMillan / Darby Townsend2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAurymar Rodriguez / Alicia Pfahler vs Celia Martin / Aubrey Hall2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Feutz / Laurie McLaughlin vs Marlene Townsend / Dorie Frum1-6, 1-6
2021-10-15vs DB - EdelsteinWon 21
W#1 DoublesAlicia Pfahler / Courtney Woody vs Hadleigh Green / Cristi Dobbs6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLindy Archambeau / Mary Cribb vs Becca Schecter / Kjerstin Terry6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAnchalee Phataralaoha / Jennine Brandt vs Elizabeth Dickerson / Shannon Reintgen1-6, 3-6
2021-10-10vs JTC - Fuller/ThiebaultLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennine Brandt / Mary Cribb vs Kim Magee / Katherine Evans5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Woody / Amber Muehlmann vs Amanda Fuller / Cynthia Thibault6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesAurymar Rodriguez / Sandra Camin vs Kristina Ford / Lan Hoang-Minh4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Courtney Woody
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Ali Messenger
published 3.5
Aurymar Rodriguez
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.23
Alicia Pfahler
published 3.5
3.22
Amber Muehlmann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Laurie McLaughlin
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.13
3.09
Lindy Archambeau
published
3.08
Jigisha Shah
published
2.49
Amy Feutz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jennine Brandt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Lindsey Wilson
published
Mary Cribb
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennine Brandt + Laurie McLaughlin31041% gamesnot enough data
Amber Muehlmann + Jennine Brandt6454% gamesnot enough data
Mary Cribb + Courtney Woody2347% gamesnot enough data
Mary Cribb + Jennine Brandt044 matchesnot enough data
Amy Feutz + Amber Muehlmann134 matchesnot enough data
Aurymar Rodriguez + Laurie McLaughlin134 matchesnot enough data
Laurie McLaughlin + Lindy Archambeau404 matchesnot enough data
Amy Feutz + Laurie McLaughlin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Courtney Woody
22W–16L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Ali Messenger
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Aurymar Rodriguez
48W–40L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Alicia Pfahler
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Amber Muehlmann
35W–49L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Laurie McLaughlin
78W–154L career · 8 lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Anchalee Phataralaoha
2W–5L career · type A · no lines in 2021
15%85%<1%
3.13
Lindy Archambeau
6W–6L career · no lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
Jigisha Shah
7W–10L career · no lines in 2021
27%73%<1%
3.08
3
Amy Feutz
20W–44L career · 4 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
2.49
Jennine Brandt
77W–116L career · 8 lines in 2021
not enough data
Lindsey Wilson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Cribb
34W–56L career · 6 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.