Teams

CAMPBELL

2025 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 55 & OVER · WOMEN 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-04-28vs Tharrington/Messier DayWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlisa Morgan / Kris Summers vs Diana Messier / Maria Weese5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGail Landon / Lena White vs Sinead Dunne / Sherri Souza6-1, 7-6
2025-03-29vs Sample Spring 3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesMary Beth Moore / Linda Wilson vs Laura Rackley / Deborah Leitch6-0, 1-1
W#2 DoublesLiz Govoni / Mary Holland vs PJ Bolduc / Kelly Stephens6-1, 6-3
2025-03-14vs Cozza/ArmeniWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlisa Morgan / Kris Summers vs Susan Adie / Patti Graber2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Holland / Liz Govoni vs Joan Cozza / Archana Gidwani6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLena White / Gail Landon vs Annette Greene / Molly Bristol6-1, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Gail Teibel
published
3.39
Kelly Ochsner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.39
Mary Beth Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Kris Summers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Cara DAngelo
published 3.5
3.32
Gail Landon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Liz Govoni
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Alisa Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Lena White
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Kristina Durham
published
Linda Wilson
published
Sara Borcherding
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kris Summers + Cara DAngelo6651% games+3.2% vs expected
Kris Summers + Alisa Morgan13257% games+3.2% vs expected
Gail Landon + Lena White6258% games−0.9% vs expected
Sara Borcherding + Kelly Ochsner224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gail Teibel
12W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Kelly Ochsner
33W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.39
Mary Beth Moore
34W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Kris Summers
32W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Cara DAngelo
30W–38L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Gail Landon
18W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Liz Govoni
23W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Alisa Morgan
27W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Lena White
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Kristina Durham
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Linda Wilson
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Borcherding
14W–3L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.