Teams

Fee - Rouveyrol

2025 Brevard Adult 18 & Over Spring · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.92 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-19vs Kiwanis - FordWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Leslie Love vs Connie Sicilia / Catalina Calvert6-1, 6-0
2025-05-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesLeslie Love / Katharyn Luer vs Linda Hall / Lisa Shaffer6-2, 6-3
2025-05-14vs EFSC - LeiterWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeslie Love / Katharyn Luer vs Bonita Madden / Angila Burke7-6, 6-3
2025-04-21vs Kiwi - SalvatoreWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeslie Love / Katharyn Luer vs Rebecca Stevens / Julianne Moore7-5, 6-0
2025-04-14vs Rockledge Rebels - MullowneyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Michelle Dunn vs Karen Kelly / Arletha White6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-04-07vs Suntree - FordWon 10
W#1 DoublesLeslie Love / Katharyn Luer vs Tandy Baerst / Laura Breisch6-2, 6-0
2025-03-24vs Brevard/Aboud/18&Over3.0WLost 01
L#1 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Nichol Fraser vs Diana Hayslip / Angela Duckworth2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Leslie Love
published
3.09
Devlin Deveney
published 3
2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.87
Brooke Maratta
published 3
2.81
Milena Alicea
published
2.78
Laura Rouveyrol
published
2.78
Kristi Swor
published
2.77
Brenda Tarquinio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.69
Michelle Dunn
published
2.49
Lael Woods
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.37
Anna Marie Pippett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Rouveyrol + Katharyn Luer134 matchesnot enough data
Daricca Facciobene + Brenda Tarquinio213 matchesnot enough data
Lael Woods + Brenda Tarquinio213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leslie Love
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.28
3
Devlin Deveney
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.09
3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Brooke Maratta
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
Milena Alicea
12W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
Laura Rouveyrol
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Kristi Swor
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Brenda Tarquinio
22W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Daricca Facciobene
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Dunn
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
8%92%1%
2.69
Lael Woods
18W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%53%47%
2.49
2.5
Anna Marie Pippett
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.