Teams

CMTA @ Wasatch Hills-Cooper/Andreason

2021 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 3.5W

9 players · average NTRP 3.25 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 Female DoublesJennie Stacey / Tracie Cooper vs Alli Gardner / Jodi Driscoll6-4, 4-3
2021-12-04vs CMTA @ Liberty Park-Bellina/CrootSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesTracie Cooper / Jennie Stacey vs Sophie Bellina / Hayley Pratt4-6, 2-4
W#3 Female DoublesBecky Hall / Mary Sorensen vs Jan Watts / Holly Miller6-3, 2-1
2021-11-20Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesCari Johnson / Becky Hall vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-11-13vs Ivory Ridge-Patch/JohnsonWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesTracie Cooper / Jennie Stacey vs Cecia Croft / Christine Adams6-4, 4-3
2021-11-06vs Cottonwood Club-Kieffer/AnnunziataSplit 11
W#1 Female DoublesLaNece Andreason / Becky Hall vs Terri Brunner / Heather Sliwa6-4, 5-2
L#2 Female DoublesTracie Cooper / Jennie Stacey vs Beata Kieffer / Janice Stokes-Burns2-6, 3-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Sarah Love
published
3.36
Sara Ray
published
Becky Hall
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Jennie Stacey
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.88
Mary Sorensen
published
2.73
Cari Johnson
published 3
2.63
Kathrine Wright
published 3
LaNece Andreason
published
Martina Stewart
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennie Stacey + Sara Ray3260% games+8.6% vs expected
LaNece Andreason + Becky Hall6849% games+2.4% vs expected
Cari Johnson + Sara Ray1440% games−11.7% vs expected
LaNece Andreason + Mary Sorensen1443% gamesnot enough data
LaNece Andreason + Sara Ray134 matchesnot enough data
LaNece Andreason + Jennie Stacey213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Love
200W–135L career · no lines in 2021
30%70%<1%
3.57
Sara Ray
85W–102L career · no lines in 2021
86%14%<1%
3.36
3.5
Becky Hall
189W–166L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Jennie Stacey
153W–129L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.23
Mary Sorensen
43W–45L career · no lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Cari Johnson
42W–75L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Kathrine Wright
39W–41L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.63
LaNece Andreason
42W–88L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Martina Stewart
20W–18L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.