GEPTA/65&over/7.0M/Tepsick/TW

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31

Carlos de Regules

usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 32% · published 3.5

2.88

Andrew Michnovicz

usually #2 Doubles 49%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3

2.84

Daniel Gallatin

usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 24% · published 3

—

Ed Savedra

usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Eloy Tinajero

usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published —

—

Fernando Lopez

usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published —

—

Jeffrey Alley

usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published —

—

Jesus Manuel Alvidrez

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published —

—

Osvaldo Orozco

usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Thomas Lore

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published —

—

William Tepsick

usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Lore + Jeffrey Alley	11–6	52% games	−6.2% vs expected
William Tepsick + Ed Savedra	0–6	33% games	not enough data
Carlos de Regules + Osvaldo Orozco	2–4	40% games	not enough data
Thomas Lore + Osvaldo Orozco	5–0	59% games	not enough data
Andrew Michnovicz + Daniel Gallatin	3–2	52% games	not enough data
Carlos de Regules + Fernando Lopez	2–3	49% games	not enough data
Ed Savedra + Daniel Gallatin	3–2	50% games	not enough data
Thomas Lore + Ed Savedra	2–2	4 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5

Carlos de Regules

79W–83L career · 28 lines in 2026

1%90%8%

3.31

Andrew Michnovicz

108W–70L career · 33 lines in 2026

<1%81%19%

2.88

Daniel Gallatin

52W–80L career · 17 lines in 2026

1%86%13%

2.84

—

Ed Savedra

53W–71L career · 11 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Eloy Tinajero

36W–37L career · 14 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Fernando Lopez

13W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jeffrey Alley

44W–46L career · 7 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jesus Manuel Alvidrez

7W–33L career · 5 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Osvaldo Orozco

39W–51L career · 15 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Thomas Lore

61W–74L career · 8 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

William Tepsick

22W–82L career · 15 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.