Teams

Black/18/5.5/CW/LCRC

2025 Lake Charles Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women · 5.5 LC (18&O) Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-12vs Callaba/18/5.5/CW/LCRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesDesiree George / Rachel Hoffpauir vs Elisha Privat / Laurie Callaba1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCHRISTY VALENTINE / Mahala Ebarb vs Emmie Gonsoulin / Tabitha Morrow4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesKatelyn Matthews / Paige Daboval vs Anne Kuhne / Catherine Osbourn6-4, 6-1
2025-10-05vs Rutland/18/5.5/CW/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatelyn Matthews / Dawn Redd vs Mari Roberts / Stefanie Nixon1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCHRISTY VALENTINE / Rachel Hoffpauir vs Melissa Lewis / Kayla Hebert7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBrittany Black / Alicia Claudio vs Tiffany Rutland / Lori Hale2-6, 3-6
2025-10-04vs Mouton/Brescher/18/5.5/Combo/GWLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatelyn Matthews / Rachel Hoffpauir vs Shelly Brescher / Kayla LeJeune1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCHRISTY VALENTINE / Dawn Redd vs Kim Benoit / Anitra Mouton5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrittany Black / Mahala Ebarb vs Erin Stewart / Blair Lumpkin2-6, 1-6
2025-09-28vs Beasley/18/5.5/CW/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCHRISTY VALENTINE / Rachel Hoffpauir vs Wendy Harper / Katie Benoit0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKrissy Morris / Katelyn Matthews vs Mary Bayles / Adrienne Hebert4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrittany Black / Alicia Claudio vs Mallory Beasley / Schantel Viator2-6, 2-6
2025-09-07vs Callaba/18/5.5/CW/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesKatelyn Matthews / Paige Daboval vs Emmie Gonsoulin / Chelsea Laurent6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDawn Redd / CHRISTY VALENTINE vs Laurie Callaba / Anne Kuhne4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMahala Ebarb / Brittany Black vs June Green / Lauren Granger3-6, 5-7
2025-08-31vs Rutland/18/5.5/CW/LCRCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrittany Black / Rachel Hoffpauir vs Emily Pierce / Kayla Hebert4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDesiree George / Paige Daboval vs Lori Hale / Elizabeth Goodwin2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAlicia Claudio / Andrea White vs Tiffany Rutland / Stefanie Nixon0-6, 0-6
2025-08-24vs Mouton/Brescher/18/5.5/Combo/GWLost 03
L#1 DoublesKrissy Morris / Andrea White vs Kayla LeJeune / Kim Benoit3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKatelyn Matthews / Rachel Hoffpauir vs Jennifer Black / Amelia Crawford2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPaige Daboval / Desiree George vs Shelly Brescher / Jessica Williamson2-6, 4-6
2025-08-19vs Beasley/18/5.5/CW/LCRCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCHRISTY VALENTINE / Krissy Morris vs Wendy Harper / Peyton Pawlicki5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDawn Redd / Andrea White vs Adrienne Hebert / Wendy Kennison3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKatelyn Matthews / Paige Daboval vs Mary Bayles / Schantel Viator6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 LC (18&O) Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
CHRISTY VALENTINE
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.81
Brittany Black
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Andrea White
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Katelyn Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.39
Krissy Morris
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Desiree George
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.23
Dawn Redd
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.05
Alicia Claudio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.95
Mahala Ebarb
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Paige Daboval
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Rachel Hoffpauir
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katelyn Matthews + Paige Daboval213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
CHRISTY VALENTINE
13W–29L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Brittany Black
12W–14L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Andrea White
12W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katelyn Matthews
7W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
2.75
Krissy Morris
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Desiree George
0W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Dawn Redd
15W–28L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
2.5
Alicia Claudio
0W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Mahala Ebarb
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Paige Daboval
4W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Hoffpauir
0W–13L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.