Teams

Ruskin/Wescott

2021 Anne Arundel Adult 40 & Over · Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / MARYLAND

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
3.19
Tammi Molavi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Gena Conron
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.12
Sorina Eftim
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.85
Peggy Bailey
published
2.70
Stephanie Ruskin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Mary Corbiere
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
STEPHANIE MILLARD
published
Shelley Sturtz
published
Tracy Wescott
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammi Molavi + Stephanie Ruskin172048% games−1.1% vs expected
Stephanie Ruskin + Gena Conron131348% games−4.2% vs expected
Tammi Molavi + Gena Conron4356% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jacqueline Kelly-Bankins
4W–4L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Tammi Molavi
115W–132L career · 3 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Gena Conron
86W–123L career · 5 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Sorina Eftim
127W–132L career · 2 lines in 2021
17%82%<1%
3.12
Peggy Bailey
18W–17L career · no lines in 2021
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Stephanie Ruskin
141W–155L career · 3 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Mary Corbiere
67W–149L career · 2 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
2.63
STEPHANIE MILLARD
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Shelley Sturtz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Tracy Wescott
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.