Teams

CROWN RED

2024 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS · MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-14vs GSCC REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesFrancisco Elias vs Michael Check6-1, 7-5
2024-06-11vs GSCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarlin Rhodes / Francisco Elias vs Patrick Battista / Ryan Scheidt6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesZach Stuart vs Robert Sanderson6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesRich Pavcek / Ivelin Dinev vs Matt Armentrout / Max Lee6-1, 6-2
2024-06-04vs GSCC REDWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarlin Rhodes / Aarjave Shah vs Robert Sanderson / Bert Chilson6-4, 7-5
W#1 SinglesFrancisco Elias vs Matt Armentrout6-0, 6-0
2024-05-28vs GSCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarlin Rhodes / Rich Pavcek vs Bert Chilson / Robert Sanderson6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesZach Stuart vs Michael Check7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesFrancisco Elias / Kipling Gomez vs Matt Armentrout / Joshua Fink6-0, 6-1
2024-05-21vs GSCC REDWon 10
W#1 SinglesMarlin Rhodes vs Bert Chilson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-05-14vs GSCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesZach Stuart / Aarjave Shah vs Michael Check / Robert Sanderson7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMarlin Rhodes vs Christian Clark6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeff Aldrich / Ivelin Dinev vs Patrick Battista / Matt Armentrout6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Kipling Gomez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Marlin Rhodes
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
3.39
Francisco Elias
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Rich Pavcek
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Aarjave Shah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Ivelin Dinev
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Zach Stuart
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Jeff Aldrich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Ted Davenport
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zach Stuart + Marlin Rhodes314 matchesnot enough data
Kipling Gomez + Rich Pavcek213 matchesnot enough data
Rich Pavcek + Marlin Rhodes123 matchesnot enough data
Ivelin Dinev + Jeff Aldrich213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kipling Gomez
54W–25L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%16%84%
3.63
Marlin Rhodes
61W–24L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Francisco Elias
81W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
Rich Pavcek
28W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Aarjave Shah
22W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Ivelin Dinev
6W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Zach Stuart
33W–30L career · 3 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Jeff Aldrich
11W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.02
Ted Davenport
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.