Teams

SDNC 8.0 San Dieguito/ Froyd

2022 Mixed Doubles 40 & Over Summer - SDNC · SDNC - 8.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Froyd / Eva Froyd vs Steven Rubin / Sharon Fleming6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2022-07-30vs SDNC 8.0 Morgan Run/ FiliciaLost 01
L#2 DoublesCorey Jung / Margot Aiken vs Marvin Pantangco / Theresa Dowe5-7, 3-6
2022-07-23vs SDNC 8.0 The Santaluz Club/ MartinLost 01
L#3 DoublesDebby Latterich / Robert Froyd vs Julie Martin / Edwin Chen2-6, 1-6
2022-07-16vs SDNC 8.0 RSF TC/ PenningtonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesRobert Froyd / Eva Froyd vs Edward Kardas / Barbara Roorda7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPhil Ryan / Margot Aiken vs Jeffrey Stafford / Diane Leffler0-6, 0-6
2022-07-09vs SoCal/Warren/Mixed40&Over8.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Froyd / Eva Froyd vs Kenny Rosenberg / May Sotthivirat2-6, 1-6
2022-06-25vs SDNC 8.0 Morgan Run/ ManheimLost 01
L#1 DoublesRobert Froyd / Diana Hoppe vs RMichael Gendreau / Katherine Thompson2-6, 4-6
2022-06-18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStepan Kartsub / Margot Aiken vs Carl Slabicki / Stacy Hall4-6, 6-7
2022-06-11vs SDNC 8.0 RPTC/ BrutonWon 10
W#1 DoublesRobert Froyd / Eva Froyd vs Rand Smith / Jennifer Iverson4-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - 8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Beth Dickinson
published 4.5
3.77
Eva Froyd
published 4
3.50
Corey Jung
published 3.5
3.47
Robert Froyd
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.34
Lori Kartsub
published
3.17
Margot Aiken
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Phil Ryan
published
3.11
Debby Latterich
published 3.5
Lynn Ryan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Froyd + Eva Froyd21140% games−5.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Beth Dickinson
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.98
4
Eva Froyd
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
3.5
Corey Jung
15W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.50
4
Robert Froyd
77W–154L career · 6 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
Lori Kartsub
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Margot Aiken
5W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.17
Phil Ryan
5W–17L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Debby Latterich
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
Lynn Ryan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.