Teams

Leon - Schoeneberg

2022 Leon Adult 18 & Over · 4.0M Adult 18 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-07-07vs Team 2Won 10
W#1 DoublesWilliam Baldock / Ira Simons vs Andrew Morris / Bill Kirchhoff6-4, 6-2
2022-06-22vs Team 2Split 11
W#2 DoublesCoy Chambers / Austin York vs Thomas Curry / Mark Horner6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJoshua Adams / Brian Bellamy vs Kenneth Seymore / Clark Kuntz3-6, 4-6
2022-06-15vs Team 2Won 21
W#1 SinglesPatrick Swanson vs Andrew Sabolic7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCoy Chambers / Austin York vs FRANCISCO SUAREZ NAVARRO / Brett Bacot5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesWilliam Baldock / Ira Simons vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-08vs Team 2Won 10
W#2 DoublesBrian Bellamy / Joshua Adams vs Andrew Morris / Bill Kirchhoff6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0M Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Patrick Swanson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
4.03
Harsha Panasa
published 4
3.90
Austin York
published 4
3.89
William Baldock
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
Riley Pool
published
3.68
Coy Chambers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.59
Arthur Wahl
published 4
3.56
Ira Simons
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.53
Brian Bellamy
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Nicolas Taureau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Harsha Panasa + William Baldock6263% games+7.2% vs expected
Ira Simons + William Baldock21760% games+1.8% vs expected
Coy Chambers + Brian Bellamy2645% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Swanson + Ira Simons404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Patrick Swanson
66W–38L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%34%66%
4.05
4
Harsha Panasa
80W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Austin York
7W–2L career · type M · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
3.90
4
William Baldock
83W–36L career · type A · 2 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.89
Riley Pool
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Coy Chambers
71W–99L career · 2 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
4
Arthur Wahl
60W–70L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Ira Simons
111W–77L career · 9 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Brian Bellamy
131W–146L career · 2 lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
3.53
Krishnan Viswanathan
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.49
Nicolas Taureau
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.