Teams

FTA40S/SpauldingFarm/Hill

FTA SINGLES 40 & OVER - Saturday · 3.0 Women 40s

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 40s have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Cindy Hradec
published 3
2.92
Debbie Hultquist
published 3
2.85
Natalie Ruggiero
published
2.76
Sherri Daniel
published
2.60
Katie Burns
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Ruggiero + Cindy Hradec4257% games+0.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cindy Hradec
49W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%11%89%
3.16
3
Debbie Hultquist
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Natalie Ruggiero
42W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
Sherri Daniel
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Elizabeth Faulkner
15W–30L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
Katie Burns
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.