Teams

NEW:Newburyport Blue:Hooper/Turgeon

2021 EMA Adult 40 & Over Women · 3.0 Women

6 players · average NTRP / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-12vs NEW:Newburyport 3.0-Maroon:PettetLost 12
L#1 DoublesNora Neale / Susan Toleos vs Rebecca Pettet / Holly Colvin2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Goddard vs Kimberly Welch2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRosemary Turgeon / Kathleen Cianci vs Lynne Cunningham / Lisa Shactman7-5, 6-2
2021-06-21vs CED:Cedardale Blue:Cavallini/MooreLost 03
L#1 DoublesMaureen Murphy / Karen Goddard vs Angela Hayden / Heather Moore0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Toleos / Rosemary Turgeon vs Cathleen Burke / Linda Walsh4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNora Neale / Katherine Weinstock vs Toni Cavallini / Lisa Brennan2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKaren Goddard / Tricia McSweeney vs Lynnell Schiela / Joan Regan6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesRosemary Turgeon / Candace Mulligan vs Patricia Woolley / Kim di Camillo4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2021-06-07vs NEW:Newburyport 3.0-Maroon:PettetSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRosemary Turgeon / Maureen Murphy vs Holly Colvin / Kimberly Welch6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNora Neale / Susan Toleos vs Lisa Shactman / Carrie Zizza5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-31vs SFT:Spark F&T Blue:MoldaWon 20
W#1 DoublesDana Hooper / Maureen Murphy vs Rhonda McKeever / Jennifer Wieckowski2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTricia McSweeney / Kathleen Cianci vs Laura Harley / Elizabeth Koontz2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-17vs CED:Cedardale Blue:Cavallini/MooreLost 03
L#1 DoublesDana Hooper / Maureen Murphy vs Heather Moore / Wendy Bacheller6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNora Neale / Rosemary Turgeon vs Diane Sollars / Kellie VanRavestyn4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesSusan Toleos / Juliet Alsina vs Susanne Spitale / Colene Nardone1-6, 6-7
L#1 DoublesDana Hooper / Maureen Murphy vs Cheryl Hemley / Pamela Vazquez6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKaren Goddard vs Lynnell Schiela0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTricia McSweeney / Nora Neale vs Kim di Camillo / Joan Regan6-1, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings23 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SSY:South Shore Servivors:Petersen/de Grasse0616817168
2KIG:Kingsbury:Hillstrand/Antonino0616822212
3BRTC:Bass River Green:Lutton0615922196
4SSY:SSYMCA Green:Rocheleau/Ulmer06131126216
5LAK:Lakeville:Bonito06111329218
6BRCC:Black Rock:Fine/Frazier06111331238
7SSY:South Shore White:Shatzkamer0691535246
8COH:Cohasset:Briggs/Eleey0681635236
9FCC:Ferncroft CC:Cirolo0671735246
10SFT:Spark F&T Blue:Molda07141433264
11NEW:Newburyport Blue:Hooper/Turgeon0791942273
12LFNT:Silver Ladies:Lord/Ingham08221023241
13CED:Cedardale Blue:Cavallini/Moore08211126269
14SFT:Spark F&T Green:Hemley/Shanahan08221028268
15NewEngland/Lannum/40&Over3.0W08201231281
16WAC:Waltham:Cellucci/Morgan08181431253
17LFW:Longfellow 40:Ackerley08112144321
18STC:Sportsmen's:Chase/ Desai0892346317
19NEW:Newburyport 3.0-Maroon:Pettet08102247320
20TRU:Trull Brook:Bojsen09251128267
21MLTC:Hot Shots:Fallon/Misch09201635279
22NETC:Dare Doubles:Welcom/deHollarn09211536291
23PAX:Paxton:Forget/O'Connor0963061393

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Rosemary Turgeon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.87
Nora Neale
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.62
Susan Toleos
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.49
Tricia McSweeney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Goddard
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Maureen Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Toleos + Tricia McSweeney1541% games−7.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rosemary Turgeon
24W–14L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
Nora Neale
8W–11L career · 5 lines in 2021
85%15%<1%
2.87
Susan Toleos
14W–20L career · 4 lines in 2021
18%81%<1%
2.62
Tricia McSweeney
5W–17L career · 3 lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
2.49
Karen Goddard
11W–17L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data
Maureen Murphy
6W–12L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.