Teams

Dean

2023 Adult 40 and Over League · 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.38 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-11vs Kauka ExpressLost 03
L#1 DoublesKipp Rice / Adam Long vs Troy Hill / J Yoshimoto3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDean Takebayashi / Lance Niimi vs Nate Riedel / Thomas Belcher5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJim Pedersen / Bernie Duarte vs Michael Marshall / Nolan Yamaki6-7, 2-6
2023-03-04vs DaleWon 21
W#1 DoublesGrant Nishida / Kipp Rice vs Dale Hayashi / Layne Oki3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDean Takebayashi / Lance Niimi vs Ted Hong / Keith Kunimoto6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDavid Fuselier / Bernie Duarte vs Warren Sako / Lester Oshiro4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2023-02-11vs DaleLost 12
L#1 DoublesKipp Rice / Adam Long vs Haddon Wong Yuen / Keith Kunimoto3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Fuselier vs Layne Oki6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJim Pedersen / Lance Niimi vs Dale Hayashi / Lester Oshiro3-6, 4-6
2023-02-07vs Kauka ExpressWon 21
L#1 DoublesJim Pedersen / Lance Niimi vs Nate Riedel / Jon Tokuuke1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAdam Long vs Nolan Yamaki6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Fuselier / Kipp Rice vs Lance Sewake / Brian Koge6-4, 6-1
2023-01-28vs DaleLost 13
L#1 DoublesLance Niimi / Jim Pedersen vs Joseph Borer / Glenn Tada3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDean Takebayashi vs Mark Chun2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Fuselier / Kipp Rice vs Lester Oshiro / Warren Sako6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesGrant Nishida / Bernie Duarte vs Layne Oki / Dale Hayashi2-6, 1-6
2023-01-14vs Kauka ExpressLost 13
L#1 DoublesDavid Fuselier / Bernie Duarte vs Nate Riedel / Thomas Belcher3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDean Takebayashi vs Michael Marshall1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAdam Long / Grant Nishida vs Kelvin Nishiura / Lance Kaneshiro6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJim Pedersen / Kipp Rice vs Dave Okamura / Troy Hill2-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
David Fuselier
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.29
Dean Takebayashi
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Adam Long
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Grant Nishida
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Bernie Duarte
published 3
Jim Pedersen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Jonathon Goebel
published
Kipp Rice
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Fuselier
38W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Dean Takebayashi
126W–142L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Adam Long
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Grant Nishida
14W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.10
3
Bernie Duarte
16W–44L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
Jim Pedersen
8W–27L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jonathon Goebel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kipp Rice
16W–11L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.