Teams

Lewis/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 4.0 Men 18 & over

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-19vs Moore/MemphisLost 23
L#1 DoublesClayton Eber / Michael Malone vs Cade Bishop / Caden LeBlanc0-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesJohn Gleysteen vs Luca Lemee6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Butorac / Oscar Carr vs Daniel Murdoch / Harrison Hunt4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRobert Rubin vs Griffin Lonardo5-2
L#3 DoublesPatrick Kerley / Will Ross vs David Kam / Darshan Sampat4-6, 2-6
2026-05-03vs Hoehn/MemphisLost 13
L#1 DoublesJohn Gleysteen / Michael Malone vs Jon Bell / Colton Wood6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesRobert Rubin vs David Collins1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesOscar Carr / Blake Boswell vs Jared Bigler / Lucas Skinner1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesMario Grant / Will Ross vs Christopher Gray / Cory Heinkel4-6, 2-6
2026-04-27vs McCully/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesClayton Eber / Michael Malone vs Ben Avant / Michael Bradshaw6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Butorac / Patrick Kerley vs Michael Corey / Taylor Long4-6, 4-6
2026-04-26vs Yen/MemphisLost 04
L#1 DoublesMario Grant / Will Ross vs Rohit Raina / Diego Hijano5-7, 5-7
L#1 SinglesRobert Rubin vs Aldell Gamble2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesOscar Carr / Stephen Lewis vs Chi Zhang / Dongwoo Kim1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesPaxton Ivy vs Cade Benedict6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2026-03-29vs Moore/MemphisWon 32
L#1 DoublesMichael Malone / Keith Rice vs Cade Bishop / Caden LeBlanc6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJohn Gleysteen vs Luca Lemee6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBlake Boswell / John Butorac vs David Kam / Daniel Murdoch7-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRobert Rubin vs Darshan Sampat6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesClayton Eber / Paxton Ivy vs Benjamin Austin / Griffin Lonardo7-5, 7-6
2026-03-22vs Hoehn/MemphisLost 05
L#1 DoublesPaxton Ivy / Keith Rice vs Freddy Ojeda / Jerry Vaughn4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJohn Gleysteen vs Scott Duncan6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesOscar Carr / Clayton Eber vs Christopher Gray / Cory Heinkel3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesRobert Rubin vs Jason Cousar5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesPatrick Kerley / Will Ross vs Jon Bell / Colton Wood0-6, 0-6
2026-03-17vs McCully/MemphisWon 40
W#1 DoublesOscar Carr / John Gleysteen vs Albert Kuhlo / Bryan Smith6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMario Grant vs Taylor Lackie6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesClayton Eber / Paxton Ivy vs Ben Gladstone / Michael Sousoulas6-1, 6-4
W#2 SinglesRobert Rubin vs John Russell6-1, 6-2
2026-03-01vs Yen/MemphisLost 23
W#1 DoublesOscar Carr / John Butorac vs Jonathan Yen / Tread Thompson6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJohn Gleysteen vs Neal Patel6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichael Malone / Stephen Lewis vs Robert Langley / BALAJI KRISHNAIAH3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesKeith Rice vs Rohit Raina4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesClayton Eber / Blake Boswell vs Chi Zhang / Dongwoo Kim3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Keith Rice
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
4.08
John Butorac
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.97
Neil Weston
published
3.95
John Gleysteen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.92
Michael Malone
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.79
Paxton Ivy
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.75
Mario Grant
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Robert Rubin
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.66
Will Ross
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.54
Oscar Carr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Patrick Kerley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.36
Clayton Eber
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Michael Holder
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Gleysteen + John Butorac123 matchesnot enough data
Oscar Carr + John Butorac213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keith Rice
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
4.16
John Butorac
15W–16L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
4.08
Neil Weston
9W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
John Gleysteen
27W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
Michael Malone
6W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
Paxton Ivy
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Mario Grant
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
Robert Rubin
4W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Will Ross
1W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.66
Oscar Carr
8W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
38%61%<1%
3.54
Patrick Kerley
12W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Clayton Eber
12W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Michael Holder
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.