Teams

THE CLUB @LIVERMORE CW7.5A

2023 COMBO · Women 7.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.70 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2023-11-05vs COLONY CLUB CW7.5AWon 10
W#3 DoublesShawn Copenhagen / Julie Borjon vs Mari Fowler / Amy Li6-4, 6-2
2023-11-02vs PLEASANTON CW7.5BLost 01
L#3 DoublesJulie Borjon / Lynne Rakestraw vs Jessica Kelmon / Tuesdai Powers7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-10-25vs OAKHURST CC CW7.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Borjon / Kelly Hankins vs Martha Matrisian / Vanessa Graciano7-6, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Nora Hart
published
3.71
Priya Kudlu
published
3.70
Margaret Gruen
published
3.70
Shawn Copenhagen
published
3.70
Danielle Duperly
published 4
3.52
Monya Lane
published
3.48
3.47
Julie Gundermann
published
3.45
Carolyn Comerford
published 3.5
3.45
Mary O'Neill
published
3.35
Dona Ray
published
3.35
Julie Borjon
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Ashley West
published 3.5
3.13
Pensri Walsh
published
Kelly Hankins
published
Patricia Kang
published
Rachel Polack
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Danielle Duperly + Nora Hart16557% games+0.6% vs expected
Priya Kudlu + Dona Ray033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nora Hart
39W–18L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.84
Priya Kudlu
8W–9L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
Margaret Gruen
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Shawn Copenhagen
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Danielle Duperly
39W–27L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Monya Lane
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
43%57%<1%
3.52
4
Christine Harkness
2W–12L career · no lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
3.48
Julie Gundermann
3W–6L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Carolyn Comerford
19W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.45
Mary O'Neill
14W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%64%36%
3.45
Dona Ray
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.35
3.5
Julie Borjon
92W–55L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Ashley West
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Pensri Walsh
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Kelly Hankins
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Kang
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rachel Polack
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.