Teams

VBTC/Van Diense

2026 IRMSL Adult 18 & Over Night SPRING · 3.0 SPRING Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.94 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-04vs VCT/DelavautLost 01
L#2 DoublesCandice Young / Darrah Abell vs Beth Kalish / Jennifer Craig1-6, 0-6
2026-05-14vs VCT/DelavautLost 01
L#2 DoublesDarrah Abell / Candice Young vs Joan Dobravsky / Diana Tremesani2-6, 2-6
2026-04-23vs VCT/DelavautLost 01
L#2 DoublesTatiana Mira / Darrah Abell vs Rebecca Emmons / Tracey Zudans0-6, 0-6
2026-04-16vs IRMSL/DeBonetLost 01
L#2 DoublesDarrah Abell / Tatiana Mira vs Amanda Kawecki / Zaida Quesada6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 SPRING Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.68 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.85
Yuliana van Deinse
published
Ana Millan
published 3
Candice Young
published 3
Carolyn Jordan
published 3
Connie Lee
published 3
JEAN STASIO
published 3
2.68
Cynthia Vallone
published 3
2.61
Marleny Burkett
published
2.58
Darrah Abell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Denice Kaiser
published 2.5
Minda Riente-James
published
Tatiana Mira
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marleny Burkett + Yuliana van Deinse044 matchesnot enough data
Denice Kaiser + Candice Young033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yuliana van Deinse
7W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Ana Millan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Candice Young
0W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Carolyn Jordan
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Connie Lee
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
JEAN STASIO
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Cynthia Vallone
3W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
2.68
Marleny Burkett
3W–11L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.61
3
Darrah Abell
5W–19L career · 4 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.58
2.5
Denice Kaiser
0W–9L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Minda Riente-James
0W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tatiana Mira
0W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.