Refunds

2023 Adult 40 & Over League · Refunds

16 players · average NTRP 3.46 / NORTH CAROLINA

Flight standings for Refunds have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03

Derrick Sink

published 4.5

3.86

Kimberly Hoben

published 4

3.82

Bob Hofmann

published 4

3.69

Tamara Carlson

published 4

3.36

Margie Devendorf

published 3.5

3.13

Virginia Katzen

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5

3.10

Trey Farley

published 3.5

3.06

Maria del Mar Vazquez

published —

2.96

Sridevi Ganesan

published 3

2.91

Rodney Myers

published 3

2.83

Yukiko Cooper

published 3

—

Denise Howard

published 3

2.73

Dina DiMartino

published —

2.53

Deborah Smith-Shaw

published 2.5

—

Melissa Leisure

published —

—

Tonya Terry

published —

Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Virginia Katzen + Sridevi Ganesan	1–2	3 matches	not enough data

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5

Derrick Sink

7W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2023

43%57%<1%

4.03

Kimberly Hoben

56W–30L career · no lines in 2023

<1%83%16%

3.86

Bob Hofmann

57W–35L career · no lines in 2023

1%89%10%

3.82

Tamara Carlson

106W–58L career · no lines in 2023

9%90%1%

3.69

3.5

Margie Devendorf

51W–46L career · no lines in 2023

<1%83%16%

3.36

3.5

Virginia Katzen

61W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023

18%81%<1%

3.13

3.5

Trey Farley

22W–67L career · no lines in 2023

23%77%<1%

3.10

—

Maria del Mar Vazquez

9W–6L career · no lines in 2023

32%68%<1%

3.06

Sridevi Ganesan

62W–47L career · no lines in 2023

<1%62%38%

2.96

Rodney Myers

20W–29L career · no lines in 2023

<1%74%26%

2.91

Yukiko Cooper

28W–28L career · no lines in 2023

1%88%11%

2.83

Denise Howard

0W–1L career · no lines in 2023

not enough data

—

Dina DiMartino

0W–4L career · no lines in 2023

97%3%<1%

2.73

2.5

Deborah Smith-Shaw

9W–2L career · no lines in 2023

0%40%60%

2.53

—

Melissa Leisure

3W–0L career · no lines in 2023

not enough data

—

Tonya Terry

1W–2L career · no lines in 2023

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.