Teams

Liberty Park Tennis-Creamer/Maxfield

2024 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 3.5W AM

21 players · average NTRP 3.56 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-06vs Salt Lake Tennis-RasmussenWon 20
W#2 DoublesInga Nelson / Allison Christenson vs Kathleen Sorenson / Sharon Larkin6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLindsey Little / Jennifer Wecker vs Marilee Cracroft / Mary Harrison6-1, 6-2
2024-07-30vs Provo High School-PageWon 20
W#2 DoublesInga Nelson / Allison Kendell vs Molly Call / Lisa Hart6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAllison Christenson / Manal Hall vs Amie Page / Lanie Wilkinson6-4, 6-2
2024-07-23vs Red Ledges-ArchibaldWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Creamer / Kristen Okland vs Dawn Jones / Shana Wood6-1, 7-6
2024-06-25Won 10
W#3 DoublesKristen Okland / Allison Christenson vs Karen Rozsa / Jennifer Evans6-0, 7-6
2024-06-11vs Ivory Ridge-Adams/WellsWon 10
W#3 DoublesInga Nelson / Allison Kendell vs Monique Tidd / Jennifer Wells6-1, 4-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5W AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Crystel Fox
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.39
Heather Hayes
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.37
Michelle Maxfield
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.34
Bessy Nielson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Melissa Hofmann
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.28
Diane Creamer
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 3.5
3.26
Robin Simmons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Allison Kendell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Jennifer Wecker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
3.23
Alena Taylor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Allison Christenson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Lindsey Little
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Inga Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Kristen Okland
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Manal Hall
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.03
Mindy Christensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Melissa Ford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Julie Hall
published
Lisa Stebbing
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Mary Kathryn Harman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Sara Green
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alena Taylor + Melissa Hofmann4356% games+10.5% vs expected
Manal Hall + Jennifer Wecker4255% games+9.9% vs expected
Michelle Maxfield + Melissa Hofmann5164% games+8.3% vs expected
Manal Hall + Melissa Hofmann2352% games+8.0% vs expected
Bessy Nielson + Robin Simmons10558% games+7.6% vs expected
Manal Hall + Lisa Stebbing1443% games+7.6% vs expected
Alena Taylor + Michelle Maxfield7850% games+7.2% vs expected
Diane Creamer + Allison Kendell7170% games+5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Crystel Fox
151W–134L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.81
Heather Hayes
84W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
3.39
Michelle Maxfield
206W–139L career · 7 lines in 2024
82%18%<1%
3.37
3.5
Bessy Nielson
213W–160L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.34
Melissa Hofmann
91W–57L career · 9 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Diane Creamer
116W–110L career · 7 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Robin Simmons
185W–89L career · 7 lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Allison Kendell
74W–56L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jennifer Wecker
92W–47L career · 6 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Alena Taylor
178W–200L career · 10 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Allison Christenson
94W–79L career · 3 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Lindsey Little
30W–87L career · 1 line in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Inga Nelson
162W–124L career · 6 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Kristen Okland
79W–74L career · 2 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Manal Hall
111W–167L career · 7 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Mindy Christensen
93W–100L career · 4 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Melissa Ford
108W–74L career · 4 lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88
Julie Hall
39W–19L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lisa Stebbing
95W–57L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Kathryn Harman
36W–30L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Sara Green
32W–76L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.