Teams

KY/LEX/Hundley-Molina 40

2024 USTA FALL LEAGUE 40 & Over · 4.0 WOMEN

16 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-12-12vs KY/LEX/JenkinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Brunner / Jennifer Janes vs KASSIE KESSINGER / Marika Wesolosky2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKaterina Molina vs Kristin Coffey6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLisa Castle / Jennifer Wilson vs Carmen Amato / Jeannie Guskey2-6, 1-6
2024-12-07vs KY/LEX/JenkinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesLori Brunner / Julie Carlisle vs Elizabeth Montgomery / Kavonne B. Webb6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKaterina Molina vs Kristin Coffey6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMargaret de Movellan / Linn Jefferson vs Janine Coy / Ann Denny6-3, 7-6
2024-11-22vs KY/LEX/JenkinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesKaterina Molina / Kirsten van Haaren vs Kristin Coffey / Kavonne B. Webb3-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesLaurie Larkin vs Emily Pernice6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Carlisle / Sarah Delahanty vs Janine Coy / Dorothy Meng7-5, 6-3
2024-11-09vs KY/LEX/JenkinsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLeslie Russ / Melinda McClain vs Dorothy Meng / Mary Ringle6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJulie Carlisle / Jennifer Janes vs Janine Coy / Jeannie Guskey7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2024-10-28vs KY/LEX/JenkinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKirsten van Haaren / Jennifer Wilson vs Elizabeth Montgomery / Carmen Amato4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesKaterina Molina vs Kristin Coffey6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBillie Walters / Sarah Delahanty vs Ann Denny / Jeannie Guskey6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2024-10-25vs KY/LEX/JenkinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesKenda Moore / Katerina Molina vs Mary Ringle / Marika Wesolosky5-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesLaurie Larkin vs Kristin Coffey6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMargaret de Movellan / Linn Jefferson vs Kavonne B. Webb / Ann Denny4-6, 3-6
2024-10-07vs KY/LEX/JenkinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesLisa Castle / Julie Carlisle vs Carmen Amato / Elizabeth Montgomery2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesKaterina Molina vs Emily Pernice6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDoris Senters / Kirsten van Haaren vs Dorothy Meng / Mary Ringle6-1, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.00
Laurie Larkin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.64
Leslie Russ
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Lori Brunner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Julie Carlisle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Jennifer Janes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Kirsten van Haaren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.41
Melinda McClain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Linn Jefferson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Margaret de Movellan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Sarah Delahanty
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Billie Walters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Kenda Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Doris Senters
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Lisa Castle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Katerina Molina
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Lee Ann Jung
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doris Senters + Kirsten van Haaren9258% games+5.5% vs expected
Melinda McClain + Doris Senters13162% games+5.1% vs expected
Linn Jefferson + Margaret de Movellan4551% games−4.6% vs expected
Leslie Russ + Lisa Castle5155% gamesnot enough data
Laurie Larkin + Kenda Moore3254% gamesnot enough data
Billie Walters + Julie Carlisle224 matchesnot enough data
Julie Carlisle + Jennifer Janes224 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Russ + Billie Walters033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Larkin
45W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
4.00
Leslie Russ
21W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
Lori Brunner
19W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.62
Julie Carlisle
10W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
Jennifer Janes
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Kirsten van Haaren
30W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.44
Melinda McClain
20W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%74%26%
3.41
Linn Jefferson
5W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
Margaret de Movellan
8W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
Sarah Delahanty
30W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Billie Walters
8W–19L career · 1 line in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Kenda Moore
15W–10L career · 1 line in 2024
5%92%3%
3.23
Doris Senters
60W–44L career · 1 line in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Lisa Castle
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
Katerina Molina
14W–9L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lee Ann Jung
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.