Teams

Miami-Dade - Doral Park/Ferrebus

2021 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Spring - Day · 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.10 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-04-15vs Martin (Salvadore Park)Split 11
W#1 DoublesViviana Vila / Sandra Morales vs KAREN LEE / Christine Edwards6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesYdelma Mora / Michelle Velez vs Jill Martin / Sara Poses7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2021-04-07Won 10
W#2 DoublesYdelma Mora / Viviana Vila vs Audrey Stone / Susan Stiphany6-4, 6-0
2021-04-07vs Pfeffer (Continental)Won 20
W#1 DoublesDayana Oca / Audimely Ferrebus vs ALEJANDRA GIL / Christine Pfeffer6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSandra Morales / Viviana Vila vs Audrey Stone / Susan Stiphany6-0, 6-0
2021-04-06vs Martin (Salvadore Park)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesViviana Vila / Fernanda Chacon vs Sara Poses / Jane de Cardenas0-6, 2-6
2021-03-17vs Pfeffer (Continental)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAURELIA BATISTA / Ydelma Mora vs Maria Pantin / Debora JAMES6-7, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDayana Oca vs ALEJANDRA GIL6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesViviana Vila / Glenda Gotera vs Audrey Stone / Christine Pfeffer6-3, 6-1
2021-03-03vs Martin (Salvadore Park)Won 10
W#1 SinglesDayana Oca vs Maria Angelica Sintes6-1, 6-2
2021-02-10vs Martin (Salvadore Park)Split 11
W#1 SinglesDayana Oca vs Demet Tekin6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAURELIA BATISTA / Ydelma Mora vs KAREN LEE / Christine Edwards5-7, 3-6
2021-02-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesViviana Vila / Marleen Acuna vs Audrey Stone / Christine Pfeffer6-1, 6-1
2021-01-20vs Martin (Salvadore Park)Won 10
W#2 DoublesSandra Morales / Viviana Vila vs Sara Poses / Mirba Rivera6-1, 6-1
2021-01-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesViviana Vila / AURELIA BATISTA vs Christine Pfeffer / Susan Stiphany6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Dayana Oca
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Sandra Morales
published
2.92
Ydelma Mora
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.82
2.72
Viviana Vila
usually #2 Doubles 88%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3
2.71
AURELIA BATISTA
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ydelma Mora + Viviana Vila3549% games+0.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dayana Oca
106W–47L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.37
Sandra Morales
6W–12L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Ydelma Mora
60W–39L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Audimely Ferrebus
11W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Viviana Vila
61W–100L career · 8 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
2.72
3
AURELIA BATISTA
10W–5L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
2.71

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.