Teams

C.McCullough

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-02vs J.FOGLEMANWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeslie O'Brien / Jennifer McCown vs Leslie Weaver / Mary Cockrill6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWanda Wilson / Sarah Breazeale vs Alison Bernhardt / Jennifer Fogleman6-4, 7-6
2023-04-25vs Y.BarthesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarissa Parrish / Jennifer McCown vs Tassie McGannon / Yuliya Barthes4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Breazeale / Stacey Jacobs vs Holly Haney / Angki Sager6-1, 6-2
2023-04-18Won 10
W#2 DoublesSarah Breazeale / Leslie O'Brien vs Rachel Mills / Carla Williams6-2, 6-4
2023-04-11vs A.Sheehan18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer McCown / Wanda Wilson vs Katie Brown / Lisa Gwyn3-6, 2-6
2023-04-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Breazeale / Stacey Jacobs vs Diane Allen / Monica Collins6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2023-03-21vs T.Kozacko 3.5 18+Won 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer McCown / Leslie O'Brien vs Tammy Kozacko / Amy Merdes4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSarah Breazeale / Brandy Foreman vs Phyllis Soltz / Wendy Lindberg6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-14vs A.Jones 18+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesCindy McCullough / Sarah Breazeale vs Julie Brigham / Heather Roberts3-6, 6-7
2023-03-07vs M.LaddLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Breazeale / Kylie Harris vs Mindy Ladd / Danielle Stringer3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer McCown / Wanda Wilson vs Maggie LaPlante / Erica Rankin2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Noelle Jackson
published
3.40
Sarah Breazeale
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Leslie O'Brien
published
3.26
Stacey Jacobs
published
3.20
Jocelyn Badulis
published
3.20
Lynda Blelloch
published
3.14
Cindy McCullough
published 3.5
2.97
Jennifer McCown
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.90
Malinda Schantz
published
2.67
Wanda Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sarah Breazeale + Jennifer McCown3252% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer McCown + Stacey Jacobs224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Noelle Jackson
16W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.76
3.5
Sarah Breazeale
111W–87L career · 12 lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.40
Leslie O'Brien
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.26
Stacey Jacobs
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%4%
3.26
Jocelyn Badulis
6W–9L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
Lynda Blelloch
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Cindy McCullough
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.14
3.5
Jennifer McCown
67W–91L career · 5 lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.97
Malinda Schantz
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
2.90
Wanda Wilson
10W–18L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.