Teams

Odom/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPAR

2025 Ruston Adult 18 & Over - Men · 3.0 Ruston (18&O) Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-04-05vs Jackson/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPARSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJohn Wakeman / Johnson Sadiq vs Taylor Pyles / Jackson Matthews6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLane Odom / George Seacrist vs Brad Simpson / Glenn Theis6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-03-29vs Jackson/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPARLost 13
W#1 DoublesClint Johnson / Ronnie Sanderson vs Jackson Matthews / Glenn Theis6-0, 6-0
L#1 SinglesSutton Cart vs Nick Hawkland1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChris Long / John Wakeman vs Brad Simpson / Taylor Pyles0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLane Odom vs Keith Sternitzky2-6, 3-6
2025-03-22vs Jackson/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPARLost 12
W#1 DoublesLane Odom / John Wakeman vs Jackson Matthews / John Boone6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesClint Johnson vs Nick Hawkland0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSutton Cart vs Taylor Pyles6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-03-15vs Jackson/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPARSplit 11
W#1 SinglesRonnie Sanderson vs Taylor Pyles6-1, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLane Odom vs Nick Hawkland4-6, 5-7
2025-03-08vs Jackson/18&O/3.0/Adult/RPARWon 32
W#1 DoublesJohn Wakeman / Chris Long vs Jackson Matthews / Nick Hawkland6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesGeorge Seacrist vs Keith Sternitzky1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLane Odom / Ronnie Sanderson vs John Boone / Brad Simpson6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJohnson Sadiq vs Bynum Miller6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Long / Clint Johnson vs Taylor Pyles / Glenn Theis2-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Ruston (18&O) Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Clint Johnson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
George Seacrist
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
John Wakeman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Johnson Sadiq
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lane Odom
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Ronnie Sanderson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sutton Cart
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Clint Johnson
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
George Seacrist
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Wakeman
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Johnson Sadiq
11W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lane Odom
5W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ronnie Sanderson
6W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sutton Cart
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.