Teams

SGV Maple Team-Lin-WN-SU/10

2025 Adult Division - 18 & Over San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 4.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesHao Truong / Ben Lu vs Vansh Talwar / Bill Michels2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesStever Leung vs Juan Francisco JR Betancourt6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKingsley Kuo / Phong Ngo vs Arnold Lopez / Oscar De La Rosa6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThomas Zou / Michael Wang vs Robert de la Costa / Christian Crosbie6-1, 7-5
L#1 DoublesDave Kang / Tam Vo vs Elik Alvarez / Andy Tromans5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDave Kang / Stever Leung vs Robert Chang / Feibi Liu2-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesChristopher Wu / Ruoyuan Wang vs John Proulx / Daniel Kanemoto6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesStever Leung vs Michael Pang3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesHao Truong / Thomas Zou vs Jay Ho / Chen-Jun Huang6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesPhong Ngo / Tam Vo vs Yoshiki Hisamoto / Shao Chen0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDave Kang / Phong Ngo vs Kevin Chong / Richard Phung2-6, 5-7
2025-04-13vs SGV Dare Doubles-Yeh-WN/SUWon 10
W#3 DoublesDave Kang / Jin Yi vs Willie Yeh / Alan Lee6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.95
Zheyu Wang
published
3.88
Stever Leung
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.77
Dave Kang
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Edward Yu
published 4
3.70
Hao Truong
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.51
Ben Lu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.48
Thai Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Jacky Lin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kingsley Kuo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Phong Ngo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Ruoyuan Wang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shaoxiong Yuan
published
Thomas Zou
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Zheyu Wang
7W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.95
Stever Leung
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.88
4
Dave Kang
138W–129L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Edward Yu
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Hao Truong
20W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Ben Lu
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.51
Thai Nguyen
29W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Jacky Lin
20W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
Kingsley Kuo
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Phong Ngo
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ruoyuan Wang
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Shaoxiong Yuan
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Thomas Zou
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.