Teams

PW.Mladsi

2024 CTRL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Tri-Level 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-06vs TOC.FettigWon 10
W#2 DoublesSimone Hayward / Jennifer Smith vs SIUHING LAI / Melissa Raasch6-3, 6-1
2024-07-18vs TOC.KimWon 10
W#2 DoublesParis Laliberte / Simone Hayward vs Yuna Kim / Rebecca Peart6-1, 6-4
2024-06-28vs ACP.NealWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarta Keyser / Lisa Slater vs Lori Neal / Cristina Middleton6-3, 6-0
2024-06-21vs TING.JohnsonWon 20
W#1 DoublesSimone Hayward / Jennifer Hensley vs Cathy Williams / Jessica Allen6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarta Keyser / Jennifer Smith vs Jaime Nolan / Kari Samborski7-6, 6-2
2024-06-14vs LOCH.LocklearWon 10
W#1 DoublesSimone Hayward / Marta Keyser vs Debra Combos / Jessica Sahoo7-6, 6-4
2024-06-13vs MD.ChuangLost 01
L#1 DoublesSimone Hayward / Marta Keyser vs Brigette Flower / Ann Gray0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Tri-Level 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Jennifer Hensley
published
3.26
Colleen McGowan
published 3
3.25
Simone Hayward
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.75
Deirdre Mladsi
published 3
2.60
Amy Munn
published 3
2.54
Marta Keyser
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.50
Luann Wiggenhorn
published
2.43
Lisa Slater
published
2.42
Joey Claussen
published
2.38
Nishi Patel
published
2.27
Lauren Spiegel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Spiegel + Nishi Patel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Hensley
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Colleen McGowan
14W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%3%97%
3.26
3.5
Simone Hayward
171W–96L career · 10 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3
Deirdre Mladsi
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
3
Amy Munn
7W–14L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
3
Marta Keyser
68W–123L career · 9 lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
2.54
Luann Wiggenhorn
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
2.50
Lisa Slater
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.43
Joey Claussen
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
0%72%28%
2.42
Nishi Patel
11W–16L career · no lines in 2024
0%80%20%
2.38
Lauren Spiegel
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.