Teams

JMontague-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Men Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.92 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-06-29vs SSelig-HVCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesAndrew Burd vs Bryson Powell6-0, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJeeka Karnas vs Alex Herzick4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs Ethan Holston6-2, 6-2
2026-06-15vs JByrd-DURLost 03
L#1 SinglesAndrew Burd vs Tevin Wilson2-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesJeeka Karnas vs Matthew Frazer0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs Craig Radley2-6, 0-6
2026-06-08vs RBerliner-DURLost 12
L#1 SinglesAndrew Burd vs Nick Gilder0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesJeeka Karnas vs Mark Scherr3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesNikita Poujai vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-06-01vs SSelig-HVCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesAndrew Burd vs William Lucas6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesNikita Poujai vs Justin Nixon6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesPradeep Hariharan vs Andrew Sheldon4-6, 5-7
2026-05-18vs JLundberg-DURLost 02
L#2 SinglesJeeka Karnas vs Christopher Green3-6, 0-3
L#3 SinglesNikita Poujai vs Al Pick0-6, 0-3
2026-05-11vs APineda-CHTCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRick Leib vs Will Lassiter1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesNikita Poujai vs Stephen Stark6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2026-05-04vs JByrd-DURLost 02
L#1 SinglesJeeka Karnas vs Hyunseong Ahn1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAndrew Burd vs Matthew Frazer2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 4.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Schumann
published 4
3.71
Andrew Burd
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4
3.67
Rick Leib
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.64
Nikita Poujai
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 4
3.58
Jeeka Karnas
usually #2 Singles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.52
Pradeep Hariharan
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 4
3.34
JAMES MONTAGUE
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Schumann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Andrew Burd
11W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Rick Leib
32W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Nikita Poujai
122W–61L career · 4 lines in 2026
14%86%<1%
3.64
Jeeka Karnas
2W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Pradeep Hariharan
197W–109L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
JAMES MONTAGUE
29W–43L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%89%11%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.