Teams

SD 3.5 Mtn View(2:2)/ Figueroa

2025 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD WD · SD - Women - 3.5 WD

9 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesNoelia Figueroa / Maria Salas Kazmi vs Debra McKeon / Tori Penick6-1, 6-3
2025-02-27vs SD WD LLW 3.5 SDTRC/ MonzonLost 01
L#2 DoublesErika Lopez / Maria Salas Kazmi vs Lorena Monzon / Kristan Hanson3-6, 3-6
2025-02-20vs SD 3.5 PBTC(2:2)/ LevineLost 01
L#3 DoublesPerla Cardenas / Maria Salas Kazmi vs Yumi Miyamoto / Christiana Thieler4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-01-23vs SD 3.5 Mtn View(2:2)/ PadillaLost 01
L#1 SinglesGuadalupe Acosta vs Cynthia Hensersky2-6, 2-6
2025-01-16vs SD 3.5 La Jolla B&TC (2:2)/ YoungWon 10
W#3 DoublesDenisse Fax / Maria Salas Kazmi vs Jessica Rogge / Kathryn Miller6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-09Lost 01
L#1 SinglesGuadalupe Acosta vs Joan Fahrenthold5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Cintya Palomares
published 3.5
3.41
Denisse Fax
published 3.5
3.39
Maria Salas Kazmi
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.39
Silvia Rodriguez
published
3.32
Noelia Figueroa
published
3.30
Perla Cardenas
published
2.96
Maria Patino
published
2.90
Guadalupe Acosta
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Alejandra Bravo
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cintya Palomares + Perla Cardenas6069% games+11.1% vs expected
Maria Salas Kazmi + Noelia Figueroa7257% games+4.5% vs expected
Maria Salas Kazmi + Denisse Fax3258% gamesnot enough data
Denisse Fax + Guadalupe Acosta314 matchesnot enough data
Guadalupe Acosta + Noelia Figueroa303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cintya Palomares
7W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Denisse Fax
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%73%26%
3.41
3.5
Maria Salas Kazmi
58W–18L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
3.39
Silvia Rodriguez
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Noelia Figueroa
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Perla Cardenas
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Maria Patino
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Guadalupe Acosta
54W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Alejandra Bravo
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.