Teams

5-JByrd-ENO

2024 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-25vs 6-JMontague-CCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnsen Gunawan / Nikita Poujai vs Matthew Davies / Mark Rhoades6-1, 6-1
2024-09-04vs 3-CLynch-ENOWon 10
W#1 DoublesNikita Poujai / Ansen Gunawan vs David Bautz / Tom Luben6-3, 6-1
2024-08-28vs 8-SBurger-ENOWon 10
W#3 DoublesDeraymes Harris / Brandon van Buren vs Blake Jensen / Richard Millard6-3, 6-4
2024-08-25vs 2-AYoung-EVWon 20
W#2 DoublesNikita Poujai / Ansen Gunawan vs Reggie Oakley / Ryan Boyles6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesYuji Winet / Deraymes Harris vs Chris Reeves / Lee Goldberg6-3, 7-6
2024-08-21vs 7-KRamaswamy-ENOLost 01
L#3 DoublesDeraymes Harris / Sagar Mistry vs Amit Sachan / Jeremy Wheelwright6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2024-08-14vs 9-ZRowles-ENOSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKevin Williams / Deraymes Harris vs Matthew Feldt / Mark Petersen1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSagar Mistry / Nikita Poujai vs Keith Buckel / Zach Rowles6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.06
Jermaine Byrd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.88
3.66
Alex Piasecki
published 4
3.64
Nikita Poujai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.58
Deraymes Harris
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Kevin Williams
published
2.91
2.90
Sagar Mistry
published
Ansen Gunawan
published
PHI PHAM
published
Vaibhav Parmar
published
Yuji Winet
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jermaine Byrd
136W–127L career · 8 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Manuel Mariategui Vargas
22W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Alex Piasecki
12W–14L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%<1%
3.66
4
Nikita Poujai
122W–61L career · 8 lines in 2024
14%86%<1%
3.64
3.5
Deraymes Harris
108W–51L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.58
Kevin Williams
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
3.30
3
Brandon van Buren
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%24%
2.91
Sagar Mistry
7W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Christopher DeFusco
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Ansen Gunawan
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
PHI PHAM
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vaibhav Parmar
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yuji Winet
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.